Memory Buffer Bounds ErrorWeakness · CWE-119

CVE-2024-21859

MEDIUM · 5.3 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-02-12
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
55/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Improper buffer restrictions in the UEFI firmware for some Intel(R) Processors may allow a privileged user to potentially enable information disclosure via local access.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

This is a buffer restriction vulnerability in the UEFI firmware of certain Intel processors. A privileged local user could exploit improper buffer handling to read sensitive information from memory that should not be accessible, potentially exposing secrets or configuration data.

MitigationApply the latest Intel processor firmware updates (UEFI/BIOS updates) from Intel's support website or through your system vendor's update channels.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
High
Privileges
High
User interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify your Intel processor model
    On Linux, run `cat /proc/cpuinfo | grep 'model name'`. On Windows, run `wmic cpu get name`. On macOS, run `sysctl -n machdep.cpu.brand_string`.
    Affected if The processor is an Intel CPU whose UEFI firmware is known to have this buffer handling issue (compare against Intel's official advisory for CVE-2024-21859)
  2. Check the installed UEFI firmware version
    On Linux, run `dmidecode -s bios-version`. On Windows, run `wmic bios get smbiosbiosversion` or check in System Information (msinfo32). On macOS, check in System Information under Hardware > Boot ROM Version.
    Affected if The firmware version is older than the version that addresses CVE-2024-21859 in Intel's release notes
  3. Verify UEFI firmware vendor and release date
    On Linux, run `dmidecode -s bios-vendor` and `dmidecode -s bios-release-date`. On Windows, use `wmic bios get manufacturer,releasedate`. Compare the release date against Intel's patch release date for this CVE.
    Affected if The BIOS was released before Intel's fix date and the processor model matches affected Intel families
  4. Confirm if Intel SGX (Software Guard Extensions) or other memory isolation features are relevant
    On Linux, check if SGX is available via `cat /proc/cpuinfo | grep sgx`. On Windows, use `msinfo32` to check SGX status. This vulnerability involves improper buffer handling that could expose memory regions that SGX normally protects.
    Affected if SGX or memory protection features are present and the firmware predates the patch
  5. Check system privilege level
    This vulnerability requires a privileged local user. Verify the threat model by checking logged-in users with `who` (Linux/macOS) or `query user` (Windows).
    Affected if Untrusted local users have privileged access to the system

Your system is likely affected if it runs an Intel processor with UEFI firmware older than Intel's patched version for CVE-2024-21859, especially if untrusted local users have privileged access.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply the latest Intel processor firmware updates (UEFI/BIOS updates) from Intel's support website or through your system vendor's update channels.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
14.0 hours of engineering $2,490
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-21859 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-21859 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data