Connect SecureApplication · Ivanti

CVE-2024-21894

CRITICAL · 9.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-04-04
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A heap overflow vulnerability in IPSec component of Ivanti Connect Secure (9.x, 22.x) and Ivanti Policy Secure allows an unauthenticated malicious user to send specially crafted requests in-order-to crash the service thereby causing a DoS attack. In certain conditions this may lead to execution of arbitrary code

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

A heap overflow vulnerability in the IPSec component of Ivanti Connect Secure (9.x, 22.x) and Ivanti Policy Secure allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to send specially crafted requests that can crash the service (denial of service) and potentially achieve arbitrary code execution in certain conditions.

MitigationApply vendor-released patches for CVE-2024-21894 immediately; if patching is delayed, restrict network exposure of the IPSec service and monitor for indicators of compromise.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Connect SecureApplication
Affected:= 9.1= 22.1= 22.2= 22.3= 22.4= 22.5= 22.6
Policy SecureApplication
Affected:= 9.0= 9.1= 22.1= 22.2= 22.3= 22.4= 22.5= 22.6

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the installed Ivanti product
    Check system information or product documentation to determine if the machine is running Ivanti Connect Secure or Ivanti Policy Secure
    Affected if The product is Connect Secure or Policy Secure and the version matches the affected list (9.0, 9.1, 22.1-22.6)
  2. Verify the exact software version
    Access the admin console or use system commands to retrieve the installed version number (typically found in About or System Status pages)
    Affected if The installed version equals 9.1, 22.1, 22.2, 22.3, 22.4, 22.5, or 22.6 for Connect Secure; or 9.0, 9.1, 22.1-22.6 for Policy Secure
  3. Confirm IPSec feature is enabled
    Review the VPN or IPSec configuration settings in the admin interface to determine if IPSec tunnels or services are actively configured
    Affected if IPSec is enabled and configured on the system
  4. Inspect for service crashes or instability
    Check system logs, VPN daemon logs, or service status for sudden restarts, core dumps, or crash reports related to the IPSec component
    Affected if The IPSec service has crashed, restarted unexpectedly, or shows heap-related error messages in logs
  5. Review network exposure of IPSec service
    Check firewall rules or access lists to determine if the IPSec ports (500, 4500, ESP protocol) are exposed to untrusted networks
    Affected if IPSec services are reachable from external/untrusted networks without adequate filtering

The environment is affected if Ivanti Connect Secure (9.1 or 22.x) or Ivanti Policy Secure (9.0-9.1 or 22.x) is installed with IPSec enabled, and the version matches any of the listed affected versions.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply vendor-released patches for CVE-2024-21894 immediately; if patching is delayed, restrict network exposure of the IPSec service and monitor for indicators of compromise.

Fix this in Connect Secure Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation6.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing8.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
26.0 hours of engineering $4,560
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,296.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-21894 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-21894 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data