CVE-2024-22024
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn XML external entity or XXE vulnerability in the SAML component of Ivanti Connect Secure (9.x, 22.x), Ivanti Policy Secure (9.x, 22.x) and ZTA gateways which allows an attacker to access certain restricted resources without authentication.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is an XML External Entity (XXE) injection vulnerability in the SAML authentication component of Ivanti Connect Secure, Ivanti Policy Secure, and ZTA gateways. The flaw allows unauthenticated attackers to craft malicious SAML XML requests containing external entity references to access restricted resources without proper authentication, potentially bypassing the entire authentication mechanism.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 9.1= 22.4= 22.5= 22.5= 22.6CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed Ivanti productAccess the device admin interface or check system documentation to determine which product is deployed: Ivanti Connect Secure, Ivanti Policy Secure, or Ivanti Zero Trust Access Gateway.Affected if The product is one of these three and the version matches the affected ranges.
-
Determine the installed software versionLog into the admin console and navigate to System > Status or use the CLI command 'show version' to retrieve the exact firmware version number.Affected if The version is 9.1, 22.4, or 22.5 for Connect Secure; 22.5 for Policy Secure; or 22.6 for Zero Trust Access Gateway.
-
Verify SAML authentication is configuredCheck the authentication policy settings in the admin interface under Users > Authentication > Auth Servers or System > Authentication > SAML, and confirm whether any SAML identity provider (IdP) is defined and enabled.Affected if SAML authentication is actively configured and users can authenticate via SAML.
-
Inspect SAML configuration filesAccess the device configuration backup or view XML configuration files under /var/log/ or the admin-exported configuration for SAML-related XML content containing entity definitions.Affected if The device accepts SAML XML requests and external entity processing is not explicitly disabled in the XML parser settings.
A user is affected if they are running one of the listed product versions AND have SAML authentication enabled, as the vulnerability requires both conditions to be exploitable.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply vendor-provided patches or upgrade to fixed versions of the affected products. Until patches are applied, consider restricting access to SAML endpoints at the network level or implementing XML input validation/filtering as a temporary workaround.
Latest patched release (contact Ivanti support for specific version number)
- 1. Identify the exact installed version of Ivanti Connect Secure, Policy Secure, or Zero Trust Access Gateway using the admin console or system information
- 2. Confirm the version matches one of the affected releases: Connect Secure (9.1, 22.4, 22.5), Policy Secure (22.5), or ZTA Gateway (22.6)
- 3. Download and apply the latest Ivanti security patch for your specific product from the official Ivanti download portal or support site
- 4. After patching, verify the SAML configuration is intact and test authentication flows
- 5. Monitor Ivanti forums and security advisories for any additional required updates
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,616.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-22024 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-22024 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data