CVE-2024-22043
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability has been identified in Parasolid V35.0 (All versions < V35.0.251), Parasolid V35.1 (All versions < V35.1.170). The affected applications contain a null pointer dereference vulnerability while parsing specially crafted XT files. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to crash the application causing denial of service condition.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA null pointer dereference vulnerability exists in Parasolid CAD software versions V35.0 (prior to V35.0.251) and V35.1 (prior to V35.1.170) when parsing specially crafted XT files. Successful exploitation causes the application to crash, resulting in a denial of service condition.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 35.0, < 35.0.251>= 35.1, < 35.1.170CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Parasolid installationCheck for Parasolid installation by looking for the Parasolid component in your system. This may be found in CAD applications that bundle Parasolid (Siemens NX, Solid Edge, or third-party apps), or as a standalone Parasolid installation. Check program directories, or query installed software for 'Parasolid'.Affected if Parasolid is not installed on the system.
-
Determine installed Parasolid versionLocate the Parasolid version information. This is typically found in the Parasolid library file (usually named something like 'xpcd.dll' or 'Parasolid.dll') via file properties, or within the host application's about/ version information. Query the DLL version using PowerShell: Get-ItemProperty -Path 'C:\path\to\Parasolid.dll' | Select-Object VersionInfoAffected if Unable to determine the Parasolid version from installed files.
-
Compare version against affected rangesIf the Parasolid version is V35.0.x, verify it is less than V35.0.251. If the version is V35.1.x, verify it is less than V35.1.170. Any version in these ranges is vulnerable.Affected if Version is >=35.0.0 and <35.0.251, OR >=35.1.0 and <35.1.170.
-
Determine XT file processing usageCheck if the environment processes XT files, which is the Parasolid native CAD format. XT files are commonly used in CAD workflows. This is typically a core function of Parasolid-based applications.Affected if XT files are processed by the Parasolid installation.
The environment is affected if Parasolid is installed with version V35.0.x (<35.0.251) or V35.1.x (<35.1.170) and the software processes XT files.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped35.0.25135.1.170
Upgrade Parasolid installation to version V35.0.251 or later for V35.0, or V35.1.170 or later for V35.1. Avoid opening untrusted XT files from unknown sources.
Parasolid V35.0.251 or V35.1.170 (or later)
- 1. Identify the current Parasolid version in use by checking the application or installation details
- 2. Navigate to the Siemens support portal or authorized distribution channel for Parasolid
- 3. Download Parasolid version 35.0.251 or version 35.1.170 (or later) based on your current version branch
- 4. Verify the downloaded update package integrity using checksums if provided
- 5. Test the update in a non-production environment to ensure compatibility with your workflows
- 6. Schedule a maintenance window and deploy the update to production systems
- 7. Validate that the application functions correctly after the update
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,512.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-22043 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-22043 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data