CVE-2024-22052
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA null pointer dereference vulnerability in IPSec component of Ivanti Connect Secure (9.x, 22.x) and Ivanti Policy Secure allows an unauthenticated malicious user to send specially crafted requests in-order-to crash the service thereby causing a DoS attack
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA null pointer dereference vulnerability in the IPSec component of Ivanti Connect Secure (9.x, 22.x) and Ivanti Policy Secure allows an unauthenticated attacker to crash the service via specially crafted requests, causing denial of service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 9.1= 22.1= 22.2= 22.3= 22.4= 22.5= 22.6= 9.0= 9.1= 22.1= 22.2= 22.3= 22.4= 22.5= 22.6CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed Ivanti productCheck the system or admin interface to determine if Ivanti Connect Secure or Ivanti Policy Secure is deployed. This can typically be found in the system information page, about section, or by running 'show system' in the admin CLI.Affected if The product is Ivanti Connect Secure version 9.1, 22.1, 22.2, 22.3, 22.4, 22.5, or 22.6, OR Ivanti Policy Secure version 9.0, 9.1, 22.1, 22.2, 22.3, 22.4, 22.5, or 22.6.
-
Verify the exact version numberCompare your installed version against the affected list. Use the admin web UI under System > Configuration > System Management > System Information, or use the CLI command 'show version' or 'cat /etc/version' if accessible.Affected if The installed version exactly matches any version listed in the affected products and versions.
-
Confirm IPSec component is enabledCheck if IPSec VPN functionality is configured on the appliance. In the admin UI, navigate to VPN > IPSec or use the CLI command 'show ipsec' to view IPSec status and configuration.Affected if IPSec is enabled or configured on the system (the vulnerability exists in the IPSec component).
-
Check for service availabilityVerify the IPSec service is running and responsive. Attempt to access the admin interface or check service status via CLI commands such as 'show services' or by reviewing system logs for IPSec-related entries.Affected if The IPSec service is active and reachable via network.
You are affected if you are running Ivanti Connect Secure or Policy Secure with a version matching any of the listed affected versions AND the IPSec component is enabled and reachable on your network.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply vendor patches for Ivanti Connect Secure and Policy Secure when available; until then, consider restricting network access to the IPSec service to trusted sources to reduce attack surface.
Ivanti Connect Secure 22.4+ or latest 22.x | Ivanti Policy Secure 22.3+ or latest 22.x
- 1. Identify the exact Ivanti product version currently deployed (Connect Secure or Policy Secure)
- 2. Consult Ivanti's official release notes and security advisories on forums.ivanti.com for CVE-2024-22052 specific patch information
- 3. For Ivanti Connect Secure: Upgrade to version 22.4 or later (or latest available 22.x release)
- 4. For Ivanti Policy Secure: Upgrade to version 22.3 or later (or latest available 22.x release)
- 5. For legacy 9.x installations: Upgrade to the latest 9.1Rx patch or consider migrating to supported 22.x release
- 6. After upgrade, verify the IPSec service runs normally and test IPSec VPN connectivity
- 7. Monitor forums.ivanti.com for any follow-up patch requirements
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,648.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-22052 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-22052 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data