Zenic One R58Application · Zte

CVE-2024-22063

CRITICAL · 9.0 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-12-30
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 16.24.40 or later.
See remediation →
94/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The ZENIC ONE R58 products by ZTE Corporation have a command injection vulnerability. An authenticated attacker can exploit this vulnerability to tamper with messages, inject malicious code, and subsequently launch attacks on related devices.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

The ZENIC ONE R58 network management product by ZTE contains a command injection vulnerability allowing authenticated attackers to execute arbitrary OS commands through unsanitized input, potentially compromising the management system and connected network devices.

MitigationImplement strict input validation and sanitization for all user-supplied parameters, avoid shell execution of user input, and apply vendor-provided patches immediately. Restrict authentication access and monitor for anomalous command execution.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Zenic One R58Application
Affected:< 16.24.40

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify ZTE ZENIC ONE R58 installation
    Check your system inventory or network scan results for ZTE ZENIC ONE R58 network management software. Look for services responding on typical management ports or the product's web interface.
    Affected if ZTE ZENIC ONE R58 is installed and running in the environment
  2. Determine installed version
    Access the product's web management interface and navigate to the About or System Information page to find the software version number. Alternatively, check local installation directories or version files if you have CLI access.
    Affected if The installed version is lower than 16.24.40 (for example, 16.24.30, 16.20.00, or any version below 16.24.40)
  3. Verify management interface accessibility
    Check if the ZENIC ONE R58 web management interface is accessible from network segments. Identify whether it is exposed to untrusted networks or the internet.
    Affected if The management interface is accessible from network locations where untrusted or unauthorized users could potentially authenticate
  4. Review authentication logs for anomalous commands
    Examine authentication and audit logs for the management interface, looking for unexpected commands, shell executions, or administrative actions that align with the timeframe of potential exploitation.
    Affected if Logs show command execution or administrative actions that were not initiated by authorized personnel

The environment is affected if ZTE ZENIC ONE R58 version is below 16.24.40 AND the management interface is accessible to authenticated attackers who could inject arbitrary OS commands through unsanitized input parameters.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 16.24.40 or later
Fixed in 16.24.40
Interim mitigation

Implement strict input validation and sanitization for all user-supplied parameters, avoid shell execution of user input, and apply vendor-provided patches immediately. Restrict authentication access and monitor for anomalous command execution.

Recommended fix Moderate confidence

Zenic One R58 version 16.24.40 or later

  1. Contact ZTE support through support.zte.com.cn to obtain the fixed release
  2. Request version 16.24.40 or later for Zenic One R58
  3. Follow ZTE's standard upgrade procedure for Zenic One R58
  4. Verify the upgrade was successful and the vulnerability is resolved

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Zenic One R58 Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation6.0 h
  • Implementation12.0 h
  • Testing10.0 h
  • Review / QA6.0 h
34.0 hours of engineering $5,940
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $9,504.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-22063 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-22063 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data