CVE-2024-22064
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedZTE ZXUN-ePDG product, which serves as the network node of the VoWifi system, under by default configuration, uses a set of non-unique cryptographic keys during establishing a secure connection(IKE) with the mobile devices connecting over the internet . If the set of keys are leaked or cracked, the user session informations using the keys may be leaked.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe ZTE ZXUN-ePDG VoWifi network node uses non-unique/static cryptographic keys during IKE (IPsec Key Exchange) secure connection establishment by default. If these keys are compromised through leakage or cryptographic attacks, an attacker could decrypt all user sessions that used those keys, resulting in confidentiality breach of user session information.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 5.20.20CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm ZTE ZXUN-ePDG presenceInventory network devices or check for 'ZXUN-ePDG' or 'Zxun Epdg' in device naming, documentation, or management interfacesAffected if The device is not present in your environment - you are not affected
-
Identify installed versionAccess the ZXUN-ePDG management interface or CLI and retrieve the software version (typically via 'show version' or system information page)Affected if Version is below 5.20.20 - your version is within the affected range
-
Verify IKE key configurationAccess the IPsec/IKE configuration section in the ZXUN-ePDG management interface or config files and examine whether pre-shared keys (PSKs) or static keys are configured for IKE security associationsAffected if Default, static, or pre-configured PSKs are in use rather than dynamically generated per-session keys - the vulnerability condition is present
-
Confirm key uniquenessReview IKE logs or key management configuration to determine if unique key material is generated per session per RFC 7296 requirementsAffected if Keys are reused across sessions or are hardcoded/default values - the flaw is exploitable in your environment
You are affected if you have ZXUN-ePDG version below 5.20.20 AND are using default/static cryptographic keys for IKE instead of unique per-session keys.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped5.20.20
Replace default/static cryptographic keys with unique, properly generated per-session keys following IKE best practices. Implement proper key management, rotation, and ensure unique key material for each session per RFC 7296 requirements.
ZTE ZXUN-ePDG version 5.20.20 or later
- 1. Identify the current version of ZTE ZXUN-ePDG by checking the system administration interface or running the appropriate version command
- 2. Verify the current IKE configuration to confirm it is using the default/non-unique cryptographic keys as described in the vulnerability
- 3. Plan maintenance window for the upgrade (IKE connections will be briefly interrupted during upgrade)
- 4. Back up the current configuration of the ZXUN-ePDG system before proceeding
- 5. Upgrade the ZXUN-ePDG software to version 5.20.20 or later following standard ZTE upgrade procedures
- 6. After upgrade, verify the new version is correctly installed
- 7. Reconfigure IKE to use unique, strong cryptographic keys instead of default values if the upgrade alone does not change them
- 8. Test IKE connections with mobile devices to confirm secure connectivity is working
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation12.0 h
- Implementation20.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA8.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $14,784.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-22064 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-22064 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data