CVE-2024-22095
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper input validation in PlatformVariableInitDxe driver in UEFI firmware for some Intel(R) Server D50DNP Family products may allow a privileged user to enable escalation of privilege via local access.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceImproper input validation vulnerability in the PlatformVariableInitDxe driver of UEFI firmware on Intel Server D50DNP Family products allows a privileged local user to escalate privileges by exploiting insufficient validation of input data handled during the firmware initialization phase.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the server modelRun 'dmidecode -s system-product-name' or check the physical server label to confirm it is an Intel Server D50DNP Family systemAffected if The system is an Intel D50DNP-series server
-
Retrieve the UEFI firmware versionRun 'dmidecode -s bios-version' from the operating system, or enter UEFI setup and navigate to the BIOS/Platform Information screen to view the firmware versionAffected if The firmware version is older than Intel's fixed version for this CVE
-
Check if PlatformVariableInitDxe driver is loadedFrom Linux, inspect UEFI variable boot logs or use 'efivars' to enumerate loaded UEFI drivers during boot; alternatively, examine the UEFI firmware image for the PlatformVariableInitDxe driver presence using UEFI firmware extraction toolsAffected if The PlatformVariableInitDxe driver is present in the UEFI firmware
-
Verify local privileged access contextConfirm the existence of local administrator or root accounts on the system, as the vulnerability requires a privileged local user to exploitAffected if Local privileged accounts exist and the firmware is unpatched
The system is affected if it is an Intel Server D50DNP running UEFI firmware with the PlatformVariableInitDxe driver at a version prior to Intel's fixed release for CVE-2024-22095.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the Intel firmware update for D50DNP family products once released, after verifying compatibility in a test environment.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,968.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-22095 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-22095 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data