CVE-2024-2216
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA missing permission check in an HTTP endpoint in Jenkins docker-build-step Plugin 2.11 and earlier allows attackers with Overall/Read permission to connect to an attacker-specified TCP or Unix socket URL, and to reconfigure the plugin using the provided connection test parameters, affecting future build step executions.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Jenkins docker-build-step Plugin versions 2.11 and earlier contains a missing permission check in an HTTP endpoint. Attackers with only Overall/Read permission (typically considered low-privilege) can exploit this to connect to attacker-specified TCP or Unix socket URLs and to modify plugin configuration via connection test parameters, persisting changes that affect subsequent build step executions.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 2.11CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check if docker-build-step plugin is installedNavigate to Manage Jenkins > Manage Plugins > Installed and search for 'docker-build-step', or use the Jenkins CLI: java -jar jenkins-cli.jar -s http://localhost:8080 list-plugins docker-build-stepAffected if The plugin is not found in the installed plugins list, meaning the plugin is not present and therefore not affected
-
Determine the installed version of docker-build-step pluginIn the Jenkins UI, go to Manage Jenkins > Manage Plugins > Installed and locate the Version column for docker-build-step; or query via API: curl -s http://localhost:8080/pluginManager/plugin/docker-build-step/api/json?pretty=trueAffected if The displayed version number is 2.11 or lower (e.g., 2.11, 2.10, 2.9, etc.)
-
Verify Overall/Read permission assignmentsNavigate to Manage Jenkins > Manage Users and review which users and groups have Overall/Read permission under Configure Global Security; check both matrix-based security and project-based authorization settingsAffected if Any user or group with Overall/Read permission is considered low-privilege and could potentially exploit this vulnerability if the plugin version is <= 2.11
-
Check for unauthorized connections or modified configurationReview the plugin configuration at Manage Jenkins > Configure System > Docker Build Step for any unexpected socket URLs, connection test parameters, or configuration changes you did not makeAffected if The configuration contains socket URLs, connection parameters, or settings that were not intentionally configured by your administrators
A user is affected if the docker-build-step plugin is installed at version 2.11 or earlier AND any untrusted users have Overall/Read permission in the Jenkins environment.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade the docker-build-step plugin to version 2.12 or later, which addresses the missing permission check. If immediate upgrade is not feasible, restrict Overall/Read permission to only trusted users.
Latest available version of docker-build-step plugin (version greater than 2.11)
- Navigate to Jenkins Dashboard
- Go to Manage Jenkins > Manage Plugins
- Select the 'Updates' tab
- Find 'docker-build-step' plugin in the list
- Select the plugin and click 'Download now and install after restart'
- Wait for plugin update to complete
- Restart Jenkins if required
- Verify plugin version is updated to the latest available version
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,376.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-2216 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-2216 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data