CVE-2024-22201
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedJetty is a Java based web server and servlet engine. An HTTP/2 SSL connection that is established and TCP congested will be leaked when it times out. An attacker can cause many connections to end up in this state, and the server may run out of file descriptors, eventually causing the server to stop accepting new connections from valid clients. The vulnerability is patched in 9.4.54, 10.0.20, 11.0.20, and 12.0.6.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceJetty HTTP/2 SSL connections are leaked when they timeout while experiencing TCP congestion. Attackers can repeatedly trigger these leaked connections to exhaust server file descriptors, causing denial of service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 10.0all versions>= 9.3.0, < 9.4.54>= 10.0.0, < 10.0.20>= 11.0.0, < 11.0.20>= 12.0.0, < 12.0.6all versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Jetty versionLocate the jetty-version.jar or jetty-core jar and run: java -jar jetty-version.jar or inspect the META-INF/MANIFEST.MF file in the jetty-core jar for the Implementation-Version attributeAffected if The installed version falls within >= 9.3.0 and < 9.4.54, >= 10.0.0 and < 10.0.20, >= 11.0.0 and < 11.0.20, or >= 12.0.0 and < 12.0.6
-
Confirm HTTP/2 connector is configuredInspect the Jetty XML configuration files (start.d/*.ini, jetty.xml, or similar) for HTTP/2Connector or Http2Configuration definitions in the Server Connectors sectionAffected if An Http2Connector or HTTP/2 protocol is explicitly configured on any server connector
-
Verify SSL/TLS is enabled on the HTTP/2 connectorCheck the connector configuration for sslContextFactory or SslConnectionFactory definitions, and confirm the connector uses HTTPS or the ssl attribute is setAffected if SSL/TLS is enabled on the HTTP/2 connector (the vulnerability affects HTTP/2 over SSL only)
-
Check for abnormal file descriptor growthMonitor the process file descriptor count over time using: ls -la /proc/<jetty-pid>/fd | wc -l (Linux) or equivalent process monitor. Observe if the count steadily increases without recyclingAffected if File descriptors are continuously growing and not being released, indicating a connection leak
The environment is affected if running a vulnerable Jetty version AND HTTP/2 over SSL is enabled, as the leak only occurs under those specific conditions.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped9.4.5410.0.2011.0.20
Upgrade Jetty to version 9.4.54, 10.0.20, 11.0.20, or 12.0.6 to patch the connection leak. Consider implementing connection rate limiting as a temporary mitigation.
Upgrade to Jetty 9.4.54+, 10.0.20+, 11.0.20+, or 12.0.6+ (choose the major version line matching your current deployment)
- Identify the current Jetty version installed in the environment
- For Jetty 9.x: Upgrade to version 9.4.54 or later
- For Jetty 10.x: Upgrade to version 10.0.20 or later
- For Jetty 11.x: Upgrade to version 11.0.20 or later
- For Jetty 12.x: Upgrade to version 12.0.6 or later
- Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the Jetty version
- Monitor file descriptor usage to confirm the resource leak is resolved
- For Active Iq Unified Manager and Bluexp: Contact vendor for specific patched releases (they support Jetty internally)
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-22201 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-22201 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data