CVE-2024-22218
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedXML External Entity (XXE) vulnerability in Terminalfour 8.0.0001 through 8.3.18 and XML JDBC versions up to 1.0.4 allows authenticated users to submit malicious XML via unspecified features which could lead to various actions such as accessing the underlying server, remote code execution (RCE), or performing Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) attacks.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is an XXE vulnerability in Terminalfour CMS and XML JDBC components where authenticated users can submit malicious XML containing external entity references. The vulnerability stems from improper configuration of XML parsers allowing external entity resolution, which can be leveraged to read local files, perform SSRF, or achieve RCE.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Terminalfour CMS versionLocate the version information in the administration interface under System Information or check version files in the installation directory. Compare the installed version number against the affected range (versions prior to 8.3.19).Affected if The installed version is earlier than 8.3.19 and the application processes XML input.
-
Identify XML JDBC component versionCheck the XML JDBC component version in the application dependencies, libraries directory, or administration panel. Compare against the affected range (versions prior to 1.0.5).Affected if The XML JDBC component version is earlier than 1.0.5 and the component handles XML content.
-
Verify XML processing functionality is in useIdentify if the application accepts XML uploads, parses XML content from user input, or uses XML JDBC for data import/export. Check application modules that handle XML-based content or data feeds.Affected if XML processing features are enabled and accessible to authenticated users.
-
Inspect XML parser configurationExamine the XML parser configuration files or settings within Terminalfour that control entity resolution. Look for parser settings that enable external entity processing, DTD processing, or external document type definition access.Affected if XML parsers are configured to allow external entity resolution or DTD processing.
-
Review user permissions for XML inputCheck which user roles or groups have permission to submit XML content, use XML JDBC functionality, or access XML-based import features.Affected if Authenticated users have privileges to submit or process XML content.
A user is affected if they run Terminalfour CMS or XML JDBC component versions prior to the patched releases AND the application has XML processing enabled for authenticated users with parser configurations allowing external entity resolution.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedDisable external entity processing and DTD processing in all XML parsers used by the application, or upgrade to patched versions of Terminalfour (8.3.19+) and XML JDBC (1.0.5+). Input validation for XML content should also be implemented.
Terminalfour version 8.3.19 or later (latest stable release)
- 1. Identify the current Terminalfour version in use (check About or System Information section in admin panel)
- 2. If running version 8.0.0001 through 8.3.18, plan for upgrade to latest stable release
- 3. If using XML JDBC version 1.0.4 or earlier, verify if a newer XML JDBC version is available
- 4. Schedule maintenance window for upgrade procedure
- 5. Perform full backup of database and application files before upgrading
- 6. Upgrade Terminalfour to the latest available version beyond 8.3.18
- 7. Verify XML parser configuration disables external entity processing if available
- 8. Test XML-based functionality post-upgrade to confirm proper operation
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,296.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-22218 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-22218 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data