CVE-2024-2223
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn Incorrect Regular Expression vulnerability in Bitdefender GravityZone Update Server allows an attacker to cause a Server Side Request Forgery and reconfigure the relay. This issue affects the following products that include the vulnerable component: Bitdefender Endpoint Security for Linux version 7.0.5.200089 Bitdefender Endpoint Security for Windows version 7.9.9.380 GravityZone Control Center (On Premises) version 6.36.1
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceAn incorrect regular expression in Bitdefender GravityZone Update Server allows attackers to perform Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF), enabling them to make the update server issue arbitrary network requests and reconfigure the relay. This pattern-matching flaw in the input validation leads to critical network-based code execution without authentication.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 7.0.5.200089= 7.9.9.380= 6.36.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Bitdefender Endpoint Security for Linux versionRun command: dpkg -l | grep bitdefender or rpm -qa | grep -i bitdefender to list installed Bitdefender packages and their versionsAffected if Version equals 7.0.5.200089
-
Check Bitdefender Endpoint Security for Windows versionOpen Control Panel > Programs and Features, or run: wmic product where "name like '%Bitdefender%'" get name,versionAffected if Version equals 7.9.9.380
-
Check GravityZone Control Center versionLog into the on-premises Control Center web interface and navigate to Administration > System > About, or check the installed package version via: rpm -qa | grep -i gravityzone or dpkg -l | grep -i gravityzoneAffected if Version equals 6.36.1
-
Verify if Update Server component is enabledCheck GravityZone update server configuration in Control Center under Network > Update Servers, or inspect configuration files in /opt/bitdefender/etc/gzuupdateserver.conf (Linux) or the Windows equivalent in ProgramData/Bitdefender/Enterprise_SecurityAffected if Update Server feature is enabled and accessible on the network
Your environment is affected if you have any of the exact versions (7.0.5.200089, 7.9.9.380, or 6.36.1) installed AND the GravityZone Update Server component is enabled and network-accessible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply vendor-supplied patches for the affected versions (7.0.5.200089 for Linux, 7.9.9.380 for Windows, 6.36.1 for On-Premises Control Center) and restrict network access to the update server to limit SSRF exploitation vectors.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA6.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $11,776.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-2223 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-2223 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data