CVE-2024-2226
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe Otter Blocks – Gutenberg Blocks, Page Builder for Gutenberg Editor & FSE plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the id parameter in the google-map block in all versions up to, and including, 2.6.4 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers with contributor access and higher to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Otter Blocks WordPress plugin is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) in its google-map block. The 'id' parameter lacks proper input sanitization and output escaping, allowing authenticated users with contributor-level access or higher to inject malicious JavaScript that executes when other users access affected pages.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 2.6.5CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Otter Blocks plugin is installedIn WordPress admin, go to Plugins > Installed Plugins and look for 'Otter Blocks' by Themeisle, or check the filesystem at wp-content/plugins/otter-blocks/ for the plugin folderAffected if The plugin is present in the WordPress installation
-
Determine installed plugin versionIn WordPress admin Plugins page, click on the Otter Blocks plugin to view its version number, or read the main plugin PHP file header for the Version fieldAffected if Version is less than 2.6.5 (e.g., 2.6.4, 2.6.3, etc.)
-
Identify google-map blocks in contentSearch WordPress posts/pages for 'otter-google-map' block type. Use WP-CLI: wp post list --all --format=ids | xargs -I{} wp post meta list {} | grep -i 'block' or inspect content via REST API. Alternatively, search database for 'otter-google-map' in wp_posts tableAffected if Any google-map blocks exist in published content
-
Check for injected scripts in google-map block IDsExamine the 'id' attribute value in any google-map blocks found. Look for suspicious patterns like <script tags, javascript:, or event handlers (onclick, onerror) embedded in the ID field. Inspect page source of affected frontend pagesAffected if The id parameter contains unescaped HTML or JavaScript code (e.g., <img src=x onerror=alert(1)> used as an ID)
-
Audit user roles with contributor accessIn WordPress admin, go to Users > All Users and review roles. Contributors can inject malicious code if they can create or edit posts containing google-map blocks. Check if untrusted users have contributor-level or higher accessAffected if Untrusted or external users have contributor, author, or editor roles with ability to create/edit content containing google-map blocks
You are affected if Otter Blocks version is below 2.6.5 AND google-map blocks with crafted 'id' values exist in your content, especially if untrusted users have contributor-level access.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2.6.5
Update to version 2.6.5 or later which contains the patch; until then, limit contributor-level access and audit existing content for injected scripts.
Otter Blocks version 2.6.5
- Backup your WordPress site database and files before making any changes
- Navigate to Dashboard > Plugins in your WordPress admin panel
- Locate 'Otter Blocks' in the installed plugins list
- Click 'Update now' if an update is available, or manually upload version 2.6.5 of Otter Blocks
- After updating, verify the plugin version shows 2.6.5 in the Plugins list
- Test the Google Maps block functionality to ensure it works correctly with the update
- Clear any caching plugins or server-side caches if present
- Review pages using the Google Maps block to confirm the XSS payload is no longer executable
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,376.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-2226 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-2226 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data