CVE-2024-22260
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedVMware Workspace One UEM update addresses an information exposure vulnerability. A malicious actor with network access to the Workspace One UEM may be able to perform an attack resulting in an information exposure.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceVMware Workspace ONE UEM contains an information exposure vulnerability where a malicious actor with network access to the UEM system may be able to expose sensitive information. The vulnerability is exploitable remotely without authentication based on the CVSS metrics.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Workspace ONE UEM installationCheck if VMware Workspace ONE UEM is installed on the system. Look for UEM console components, services, or documentation indicating UEM deployment.Affected if The product is present and running
-
Identify UEM console network exposureDetermine if the UEM console or administrative interface is reachable over the network. Check firewall rules, load balancer configurations, or reverse proxy settings that expose the UEM web interface.Affected if The UEM console is accessible from network segments beyond the trusted internal network
-
Verify unauthenticated access is possibleTest whether the UEM login page or API endpoints are reachable without credentials from an untrusted network location. Attempt to access the console URL directly without providing authentication.Affected if The UEM console responds to requests without requiring authentication
-
Check network segmentationReview network ACLs, firewall rules, or VLAN configurations to determine if the UEM system is isolated from untrusted or external networks.Affected if There are no network restrictions preventing untrusted access to the UEM system
A user is affected if Workspace ONE UEM is deployed and its console or administrative interface is accessible from untrusted network locations without authentication.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the VMware-provided patch/update for Workspace ONE UEM. Restrict network access to the UEM console and implement network segmentation to limit exposure until the patch can be applied.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,648.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-22260 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-22260 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data