Improper Privilege ManagementWeakness · CWE-269

CVE-2024-22264

HIGH · 7.2 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-05-08
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
78/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
VMware Avi Load Balancer contains a privilege escalation vulnerability. A malicious actor with admin privileges on VMware Avi Load Balancer can create, modify, execute and delete files as a root user on the host system.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

VMware Avi Load Balancer contains a privilege escalation vulnerability where an authenticated user with admin-level privileges can escalate to root access on the underlying host operating system, allowing creation, modification, execution, and deletion of files with root permissions.

MitigationApply vendor patches when available; restrict admin access to trusted personnel only and implement least-privilege access controls on the Avi Load Balancer admin interface.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
High
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm VMware Avi Load Balancer is installed
    Check for the Avi Load Balancer service by reviewing installed software, running processes (avi-controller, avi-se [service]), or accessing the admin web interface on port 443. Look for 'Avi Networks' or 'VMware Avi' in system inventory or service listings.
    Affected if The product VMware Avi Load Balancer is present in the environment
  2. Determine the installed version
    Log into the Avi Load Balancer admin interface and navigate to Administration > System > Settings, or run 'show version' via the Avi CLI (avi_cli). Record the exact version number displayed.
    Affected if The installed version matches or predates any vulnerable version of Avi Load Balancer (compare to vendor advisories for the fixed release)
  3. Verify admin-level accounts exist
    In the Avi admin interface, navigate to Administration > User Administration > Users. Review the list of users with the 'Admin' or 'Super User' role. Count how many admin accounts are configured.
    Affected if One or more admin-level user accounts are configured and accessible
  4. Check for unauthorized root-level file access
    Review system logs (System > Logs > Audit) for any commands or file operations originating from admin users that modified files outside the expected application directories, or check the underlying Linux host (if accessible) for any new files or modifications in /, /root, or /tmp created by the avi service account.
    Affected if Files exist on the host system that were created or modified by the avi service account beyond normal application scope, or audit logs show unexpected file operations from admin sessions
  5. Inspect for suspicious admin sessions or privilege escalation indicators
    In the Avi admin interface, review Administration > Sessions to check for active admin sessions, and review the audit logs for any commands that indicate use of shell, exec, or file manipulation utilities. If host access is available, run 'sudo -l -U avi' or check /var/log/avi for escalation attempts.
    Affected if Audit logs or session records show abnormal admin activity, or the avi service account has unexpected sudo privileges on the host

If VMware Avi Load Balancer is present and the installed version is unpatched, an authenticated admin user can escalate to root on the host; check version, audit logs, and host file integrity to confirm exposure.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply vendor patches when available; restrict admin access to trusted personnel only and implement least-privilege access controls on the Avi Load Balancer admin interface.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
22.0 hours of engineering $3,860
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-22264 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-22264 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data