CVE-2024-22273
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe storage controllers on VMware ESXi, Workstation, and Fusion have out-of-bounds read/write vulnerability. A malicious actor with access to a virtual machine with storage controllers enabled may exploit this issue to create a denial of service condition or execute code on the hypervisor from a virtual machine in conjunction with other issues.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe storage controllers in VMware ESXi, Workstation, and Fusion contain an out-of-bounds read/write vulnerability. An attacker with access to a virtual machine that has storage controllers enabled can exploit this flaw to potentially cause a denial of service condition or, when chained with other vulnerabilities, execute code on the underlying hypervisor.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 4.0, < 5.1.1>= 17.0.0, < 17.5.1= 7.0= 8.0>= 13.0.0, < 13.5.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the VMware product typeDetermine whether the system runs VMware ESXi, Workstation, Fusion, or Cloud Foundation. On ESXi, run 'vmware -l' or check the vSphere Client login screen. On Workstation or Fusion, check the application name in the title bar or Help > About.Affected if The product is ESXi 7.0, ESXi 8.0, Workstation 17.0.0-17.5.0, Fusion 13.0.0-13.5.0, or Cloud Foundation 4.0-5.1.0.
-
Check the installed version numberFor ESXi, run 'esxcli system version get' or view the DCUI boot screen. For Workstation, run 'vmware -v' from command line or open Help > About VMware Workstation. For Fusion, open VMware Fusion > About VMware Fusion. Compare the exact version to the affected ranges.Affected if The version falls within: ESXi 7.0, ESXi 8.0, Workstation 17.0.0 through 17.5.0, Fusion 13.0.0 through 13.5.0, or Cloud Foundation 4.0.0 through 5.1.0.
-
Confirm storage controllers exist on any VMsReview VM configuration files (.vmx for Workstation/Fusion, .vmx or via vSphere for ESXi) for scsi or sata controller entries. In vSphere Client, select a VM > VM Hardware > check for SCSI or SATA controllers. In Workstation/Fusion, right-click VM > Settings > check SCSI or SATA controllers are present.Affected if Any virtual machine has a storage controller (SCSI or SATA) configured, which is the default for nearly all VMs.
-
Verify network access to VM consoleDetermine if untrusted users or networks have access to the VM remote console or console files. Check VM network permissions, firewall rules, and whether the VM console is exposed to the internet or untrusted LAN segments.Affected if The VM console or configuration is accessible to users without hypervisor administrative privileges.
A system is affected if it runs an unpatched VMware product in the listed version range AND hosts at least one virtual machine with a storage controller, combined with access granted to untrusted users.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped5.1.113.5.117.5.1
Apply the official VMware security patches for CVE-2024-22273 to all affected ESXi, Workstation, and Fusion installations. Until patched, restrict access to virtual machines with storage controllers to trusted users only and follow least-privilege principles.
Workstation: 17.5.1 | Fusion: 13.5.1 | Cloud Foundation: 5.1.1 | ESXi: Apply latest security patches for 7.0/8.0
- 1. Identify the affected VMware product in your environment (ESXi, Workstation, Fusion, or Cloud Foundation)
- 2. For VMware ESXi: Check available patches at support.broadcom.com and apply the latest security patches for version 7.0 or 8.0
- 3. For VMware Workstation: Upgrade to version 17.5.1 or later
- 4. For VMware Fusion: Upgrade to version 13.5.1 or later
- 5. For VMware Cloud Foundation: Upgrade to version 5.1.1 or later
- 6. After upgrading, verify the installation by checking the product version
- 7. Test that virtual machines with storage controllers function normally post-upgrade
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-22273 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-22273 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data