CVE-2024-22326
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIBM System Storage DS8900F 89.22.19.0, 89.30.68.0, 89.32.40.0, 89.33.48.0, 89.40.83.0, and 89.40.93.0 could allow a remote user to create an LDAP connection with a valid username and empty password to establish an anonymous connection. IBM X-Force ID: 279518.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceIBM System Storage DS8900F contains an LDAP authentication bypass vulnerability where a remote attacker can establish an anonymous connection using a valid username with an empty password. This allows unauthorized access to the storage system through improperly configured LDAP authentication that accepts empty credentials.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 89.22.19.0= 89.30.68.0= 89.32.40.0= 89.33.48.0= 89.40.83.0= 89.40.93.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check DS8900F firmware versionAccess the IBM System Storage DS8900F management interface (via IBM Storage Manager or CLI) and retrieve the current firmware version. The version is typically displayed in the system overview or hardware status section.Affected if The installed firmware version matches 89.22.19.0, 89.30.68.0, 89.32.40.0, 89.33.48.0, 89.40.83.0, or 89.40.93.0 exactly.
-
Verify LDAP authentication is enabledIn the DS8900F management interface, navigate to Security Settings or User Authentication settings and confirm whether LDAP authentication is configured and active for the storage system.Affected if LDAP authentication is enabled and configured on the storage system.
-
Inspect LDAP configuration for empty password handlingWithin the LDAP settings on the DS8900F, examine the password policy or authentication parameters to determine if the system is configured to accept empty passwords or allow anonymous binds using a valid username with a blank password.Affected if The LDAP configuration permits empty passwords or allows authentication bypass with a blank password for valid usernames.
You are affected if your DS8900F runs any of the listed firmware versions AND LDAP authentication is configured in a way that accepts empty passwords.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpdate the DS8900F to a patched version beyond 89.40.93.0 and configure LDAP to reject empty passwords, enforcing proper authentication for all connections.
IBM System Storage DS8900F firmware 89.40.93.0 (or latest available)
- 1. Identify the current firmware version of the IBM System Storage DS8900F by accessing the storage system management interface or running the appropriate CLI command.
- 2. Download the latest IBM System Storage DS8900F firmware version from IBM Support (www.ibm.com) - version 89.40.93.0 or the most recent available version.
- 3. Review IBM's firmware update documentation and release notes for any prerequisites or special instructions.
- 4. Create a backup of the current storage system configuration as a precautionary measure.
- 5. Schedule a maintenance window as firmware updates may require system downtime.
- 6. Apply the firmware update following IBM's documented upgrade procedure, which typically involves uploading the firmware through the management interface or CLI.
- 7. After the update completes, verify the new firmware version is correctly installed.
- 8. Test the LDAP configuration to confirm the authentication issue is resolved (empty password should no longer establish anonymous connections).
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-22326 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-22326 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data