Txseries For MultiplatformApplication · Ibm

CVE-2024-22345

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-05-14
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
IBM TXSeries for Multiplatforms 8.2 transmits or stores authentication credentials, but it uses an insecure method that is susceptible to unauthorized interception and/or retrieval. IBM X-Force ID: 280192.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

IBM TXSeries for Multiplatforms version 8.2 contains a vulnerability where authentication credentials are transmitted or stored using an insecure method susceptible to interception or unauthorized retrieval. This could allow an attacker with network access to intercept credentials or access improperly protected credential storage.

MitigationReview and update credential handling mechanisms to use strong, industry-standard encryption for both storage and transmission of authentication credentials. Ensure TLS/SSL is properly configured for all credential transmission paths.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Txseries For MultiplatformApplication
Affected:= 8.2

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify IBM TXSeries for Multiplatforms version
    Run 'cicslscm -v' or check the installed version via your package manager to confirm the exact version number
    Affected if The installed version is exactly 8.2
  2. Identify credential transmission paths
    Review IBM TXSeries configuration files (such as cicsconfig, cics credentials, or environment configuration files) to locate where authentication credentials are transmitted over the network
    Affected if Credentials are being transmitted without TLS/SSL encryption or over unencrypted protocols
  3. Check TLS/SSL configuration for CICS regions
    Inspect the CICS region configuration files and verify whether SSL/TLS is enabled for all network communication channels that handle authentication
    Affected if SSL/TLS is disabled or not properly configured for credential transmission channels
  4. Examine credential storage mechanisms
    Review configuration files and directories where IBM TXSeries stores authentication credentials (check user registries, LDAP configurations, or local user definitions)
    Affected if Credentials are stored in plaintext, weakly encrypted, or in files with inadequate access controls
  5. Review network exposure of credential handling interfaces
    Identify all network-accessible interfaces that handle authentication (such as CICS Explorer, CICSPlex SM, or web services) and verify their encryption status
    Affected if Network interfaces handling credentials are accessible over unencrypted connections

You are affected if IBM TXSeries for Multiplatforms version 8.2 is installed AND credentials are transmitted or stored without strong encryption or TLS/SSL protection.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Review and update credential handling mechanisms to use strong, industry-standard encryption for both storage and transmission of authentication credentials. Ensure TLS/SSL is properly configured for all credential transmission paths.

Fix this in Txseries For Multiplatform Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation12.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA3.0 h
25.0 hours of engineering $4,400
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,040.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-22345 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-22345 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data