CVE-2024-22369
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedDeserialization of Untrusted Data vulnerability in Apache Camel SQL ComponentThis issue affects Apache Camel: from 3.0.0 before 3.21.4, from 3.22.0 before 3.22.1, from 4.0.0 before 4.0.4, from 4.1.0 before 4.4.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.4.0, which fixes the issue. If users are on the 4.0.x LTS releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.0.4. If users are on 3.x, they are suggested to move to 3.21.4 or 3.22.1
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is a deserialization of untrusted data vulnerability in Apache Camel SQL Component. The vulnerability allows attackers to potentially execute arbitrary code or cause denial of service by supplying malicious serialized data to the SQL component's deserialization endpoints.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 3.0.0, < 3.21.4>= 4.0.0, < 4.0.4>= 4.1.0, < 4.4.0= 3.22.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine Apache Camel versionInspect your project's pom.xml, build.gradle, or runtime dependencies for the camel-core or camel-sql artifact version. If running a deployed application, check the JAR manifest or classpath for org.apache.camel version.Affected if Installed version falls within 3.0.0 to 3.21.3, 3.22.0, 4.0.0 to 4.0.3, or 4.1.0 to 4.3.0 range
-
Identify if camel-sql component is in useSearch project dependencies for the camel-sql library (org.apache.camel:camel-sql). Check route definitions in Java, XML, or YAML configuration files for sql: endpoints.Affected if camel-sql component is present in dependencies and used in any route definition
-
Check SQL component data source exposureReview the SQL component configuration for dataSource or dataSourceRef references. Determine whether connected databases or query inputs originate from untrusted or external sources.Affected if SQL component connects to databases with untrusted query input or deserializes data from untrusted sources
-
Inspect deserialization usage in SQL routesExamine SQL route configurations for any use of serialization/deserialization features, custom type converters handling Java objects, or integration with external systems that supply serialized payloads.Affected if SQL routes accept or process serialized Java objects from external or untrusted inputs
You are affected if your Apache Camel version is within the vulnerable ranges AND the SQL component is actively processing untrusted data through deserialization endpoints.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped3.21.44.0.44.4.0
Upgrade Apache Camel to version 4.4.0, or to 4.0.4 for 4.0.x LTS users, or to 3.21.4/3.22.1 for 3.x users. If immediate upgrade is not possible, avoid using the SQL component with untrusted data sources.
Upgrade to 4.4.0 (recommended) or 3.21.4/3.22.1/4.0.4 based on current version branch
- 1. Identify the current Apache Camel version in use by checking pom.xml or dependency management files
- 2. Based on current version, determine the appropriate upgrade target: if on 3.x (except 3.21.4 or 3.22.1), upgrade to 3.21.4 or 3.22.1; if on 4.0.0-4.0.3, upgrade to 4.0.4; if on 4.1.0-4.3.x, upgrade to 4.4.0
- 3. Update the Camel version in Maven pom.xml or build configuration to the chosen fixed version
- 4. Rebuild the application and run all tests to verify compatibility
- 5. Deploy the updated application
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,752.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-22369 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-22369 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data