CVE-2024-2283
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability classified as critical has been found in boyiddha Automated-Mess-Management-System 1.0. Affected is an unknown function of the file /member/view.php. The manipulation of the argument date leads to sql injection. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. VDB-256050 is the identifier assigned to this vulnerability. NOTE: The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA critical SQL injection vulnerability exists in the Automated-Mess-Management-System 1.0 at /member/view.php. The 'date' parameter is not properly sanitized, allowing attackers to inject arbitrary SQL commands. This remote, unauthenticated attack has a CVSS score of 9.8 and public exploits are available.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Locate the Automated Mess Management System installationSearch the web server document root for files named view.php within a /member directory, or look for the application's main entry point files (index.php, login.php) to confirm the application is present.Affected if The Boyiddha Automated Mess Management System is installed on the server.
-
Confirm the application versionCheck the application for a version identifier in source files, a README, or a version config. Compare against version 1.0.Affected if The installed version is exactly 1.0.
-
Verify the vulnerable file existsLocate the /member/view.php file within the application directory structure. If this file exists, the SQL injection point is present.Affected if The file /member/view.php exists in the application.
-
Test the date parameter for injection susceptibilitySubmit a crafted date parameter value (such as a single quote or boolean-based payload like ' OR '1'='1) to /member/view.php via GET or POST request. Observe if the application returns SQL error messages or exhibits unexpected behavior.Affected if The application processes the date parameter without proper sanitization, returning SQL errors or leaking data.
If the Automated Mess Management System version 1.0 is installed with the /member/view.php file present and accessible, the system is affected by this SQL injection vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataReplace dynamic SQL queries with parameterized statements/prepared statements in view.php, implement proper input validation for the date parameter, and conduct a broader code review to identify similar injection points.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-2283 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-2283 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data