CVE-2024-2315
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAPTIOV contains a vulnerability in BIOS where may cause Improper Access Control by a local attacker. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may lead to unexpected SPI flash modifications and BIOS boot kit launches, also impacting the availability.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceAPTIOV BIOS contains an improper access control vulnerability that allows a local attacker to modify SPI flash content, potentially enabling BIOS boot kit deployment and causing unexpected system availability issues.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 5.0, < 5.037CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the BIOS vendor and firmware typeCheck system BIOS information using tools like dmidecode, BIOS setup utility, or system information utilities (e.g., msinfo32 on Windows, biosdecode or dmidecode on Linux)Affected if The system does not use Ami Aptio V BIOS - if a different BIOS vendor/type is used, this CVE does not apply
-
Determine the installed Ami Aptio V versionRetrieve the BIOS version from system information tools, BIOS setup, or system-specific utilities (such as dmidecode -s bios-version on Linux, or msinfo32 on Windows)Affected if The installed version cannot be determined or the system does not report an Ami Aptio V version number
-
Compare installed version against affected rangeVerify the installed BIOS version against the vulnerable range: version 5.0 through 5.036.x (any version >= 5.0 but < 5.037)Affected if The installed version falls within the vulnerable range (5.0 <= version < 5.037)
-
Assess local access controlsReview local user account privileges and system administration access controls to determine if untrusted local users could interact with BIOS/UEFI settings or firmware update mechanismsAffected if Local users with elevated privileges or physical access exist without strict access controls, increasing exploitability (though version check is the primary indicator)
The system is affected if it runs Ami Aptio V BIOS with version 5.0 through 5.036.x; otherwise, it is not in the affected range.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped5.037
Apply vendor-supplied BIOS/firmware updates, enforce least-privilege access controls for local system administration, and implement physical security measures to limit unauthorized local access.
Aptio V version 5.037 or later
- 1. Identify the current BIOS version installed on the affected system by accessing the BIOS setup utility or using system information tools
- 2. Download the latest Aptio V BIOS firmware version 5.037 or later from the system manufacturer's official support website
- 3. Verify the firmware package integrity using checksums provided by the manufacturer
- 4. Create a backup of the current BIOS configuration if the system provides backup/restore capabilities
- 5. Follow the manufacturer's recommended BIOS update process, which typically involves running a firmware update utility or flashing via the BIOS setup interface
- 6. Ensure uninterrupted power during the firmware update process to prevent corruption
- 7. After the update completes, verify the new BIOS version reflects 5.037 or later
- 8. Reset BIOS to optimized default settings if necessary and reconfigure any custom settings
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-2315 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-2315 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data