CVE-2024-23449
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn uncaught exception in Elasticsearch >= 8.4.0 and < 8.11.1 occurs when an encrypted PDF is passed to an attachment processor through the REST API. The Elasticsearch ingest node that attempts to parse the PDF file will crash. This does not happen with password-protected PDF files or with unencrypted PDF files.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceIn Elasticsearch versions 8.4.0 through 8.11.0, the ingest attachment processor does not properly handle encrypted (but not password-protected) PDF files submitted via the REST API, causing an uncaught exception that crashes the ingest node.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 8.4.0, < 8.11.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Elasticsearch versionRun `GET /` on the Elasticsearch cluster or check the version file in the Elasticsearch installation directory. The version will be returned in the response under the 'number' field.Affected if The version is 8.4.0, 8.4.1, 8.4.2, 8.4.3, 8.5.0 through 8.11.0 (any version >= 8.4.0 and < 8.11.1)
-
Verify ingest attachment processor plugin is installedRun `GET /_cat/plugins?v` to list installed plugins. Look for 'ingest-attachment' in the list.Affected if The ingest-attachment plugin is installed and the version falls in the affected range above
-
Identify ingest pipelines using the attachment processorRun `GET /_ingest/pipeline/_all?pretty` to retrieve all pipeline definitions. Search for 'attachment' processor type in the response.Affected if Any pipeline contains an 'attachment' processor and the Elasticsearch version is in the affected range
-
Check for PDF ingestion via REST APIReview API access logs or audit logs for POST/PUT requests to Elasticsearch endpoints that index PDF content, particularly to indices referenced by pipelines using the attachment processor.Affected if PDF files are being submitted to Elasticsearch via REST API to be processed by pipelines containing the attachment processor
You are affected if your Elasticsearch version is 8.4.0 through 8.11.0, the ingest-attachment plugin is installed, and encrypted (non-password-protected) PDF files are being submitted via the REST API to pipelines using the attachment processor.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped8.11.1
Upgrade Elasticsearch to version 8.11.1 or later, which contains the fix for this uncaught exception in the attachment processor.
8.11.1
- Backup your Elasticsearch data and configuration before proceeding with any upgrade
- Review the Elasticsearch 8.11.1 release notes for any breaking changes or migration considerations
- Test the upgrade in a non-production/staging environment first
- Stop any ingest pipelines that use the attachment processor to avoid crashes during upgrade
- Upgrade Elasticsearch to version 8.11.1 or later following the standard upgrade procedure
- Verify the attachment processor can handle encrypted PDFs without crashing after the upgrade
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-23449 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-23449 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data