CVE-2024-23500
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedServer-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in StellarWP Gutenberg Blocks by Kadence Blocks kadence-blocks.This issue affects Gutenberg Blocks by Kadence Blocks: from n/a through <= 3.2.19.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceServer-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Kadence Blocks WordPress plugin allows attackers to make the server perform unintended requests to internal or external resources due to insufficient URL validation in the Gutenberg blocks functionality.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 3.2.20CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Kadence Blocks plugin is installedCheck your WordPress installation for the Kadence Blocks plugin. This can be done via WordPress admin dashboard under Plugins, or by checking the /wp-content/plugins/kadence-blocks directory exists on the server.Affected if The Kadence Blocks plugin is present in the WordPress installation
-
Identify the installed Kadence Blocks versionLocate the plugin version number. In WordPress admin, go to Plugins > Installed Plugins and find the version listed under Kadence Blocks. Alternatively, check the main plugin file header in kadence-blocks/class-kadence-blocks.php for the 'Version' comment, or use 'wp plugin list' via wp-cli.Affected if The version number is lower than 3.2.20
-
Confirm Gutenberg block editor is activeVerify that the block editor (Gutenberg) is enabled on the site. This can be checked in WordPress admin under Settings > Writing > Use the block editor, or by attempting to edit a post using the block editor interface.Affected if The block editor is active and Kadence custom blocks are available for use
A user is affected if Kadence Blocks plugin is installed with a version lower than 3.2.20 and the Gutenberg block editor with Kadence blocks is in use.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped3.2.20
Update Kadence Blocks plugin to version 3.2.20 or later. If immediate update is not possible, restrict outbound network access from the web server and implement URL allowlisting as a compensating control.
Version 3.2.20 or later of Gutenberg Blocks With Ai (Kadence Blocks)
- Log in to your WordPress admin dashboard
- Navigate to Plugins > Installed Plugins
- Find 'Gutenberg Blocks With Ai' (or 'Kadence Blocks') in the plugin list
- Click 'Update now' if an update is available, or manually upload version 3.2.20
- Verify the plugin version shows 3.2.20 or higher after updating
- Test that the site's frontend and editor functionality work correctly
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,936.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-23500 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-23500 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data