CVE-2024-23510
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Martyn Chamberlin Don't Muck My Markup.This issue affects Don't Muck My Markup: from n/a through 1.8.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the WordPress plugin 'Don't Muck My Markup' (versions through 1.8). The plugin fails to properly validate anti-CSRF tokens on form submissions and/or AJAX actions, allowing attackers to trick authenticated administrators into performing unintended actions.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 1.8CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm plugin installation and versionNavigate to WordPress Admin > Plugins and locate 'Don't Muck My Markup' by Martynchamberlin. Note the installed version number.Affected if The installed version is 1.8 or lower.
-
Locate plugin PHP filesAccess the WordPress installation via file manager or FTP. Navigate to /wp-content/plugins/dont-muck-my-markup/ and list all PHP files.Affected if The plugin directory exists and contains PHP files.
-
Inspect form handling for nonce verificationOpen the main plugin PHP file(s) and search for form-related code (functions containing 'form', 'POST', 'submit'). Examine whether each form includes a nonce field (wp_nonce_field, wp_create_nonce, or similar) and whether that nonce is verified on submission (check_admin_referer, wp_verify_nonce).Affected if Forms exist that lack nonce field generation or lack nonce verification logic before processing.
-
Inspect AJAX handlers for nonce verificationSearch the plugin files for add_action calls with 'wp_ajax' or 'wp_ajax_nopriv'. Identify the callback functions for these AJAX endpoints and check whether they verify nonces using wp_verify_nonce or check_admin_referer.Affected if AJAX endpoints exist that do not verify nonces before processing requests.
-
Check for referrer validationSearch the plugin code for checks of the HTTP Referer header ( $_SERVER['HTTP_REFERER'] ) or Origin header as secondary CSRF protection.Affected if No referrer or origin header validation is implemented as defense-in-depth.
A user is affected if the plugin 'Don't Muck My Markup' version 1.8 or lower is installed and its code lacks proper nonce validation on form submissions or AJAX actions.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement anti-CSRF tokens (nonces) on all form submissions and AJAX endpoints within the plugin, and verify these nonces on processing. Additionally, implement proper referrer header validation as a defense-in-depth measure.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-23510 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-23510 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data