CVE-2024-23529
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn out-of-bounds read vulnerability in WLAvalancheService component of Ivanti Avalanche before 6.4.3, in certain conditions can allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to read sensitive information in memory.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceAn out-of-bounds read vulnerability exists in the WLAvalancheService component of Ivanti Avalanche prior to version 6.4.3. This flaw allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to read sensitive information from memory due to improper bounds checking, potentially exposing configuration data, credentials, or other memory-resident secrets.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 6.4.3.528CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Ivanti Avalanche is installedCheck for Ivanti Avalanche installation directory (commonly C:\Program Files\Ivanti\Avalanche or /opt/ivanti/avalanche) or look for Avalanche services in Windows Services or Linux service listingsAffected if Ivanti Avalanche software is present on the system
-
Identify installed Avalanche versionLocate the version information - typically in the About dialog within the Avalanche console, or check version files in the installation directory (often found in version.txt, or in the metadata of WLAvalancheService.exe/dll)Affected if The installed version is earlier than 6.4.3.528 (or the version cannot be determined)
-
Verify WLAvalancheService component statusCheck if the WLAvalancheService Windows service (or Unix daemon) is running - in Windows use Services.msc or 'sc query WLAvalancheService', in Linux check process list for avalanche or wlavalanche serviceAffected if WLAvalancheService is installed and running as the vulnerable component
-
Check network exposure of WLAvalancheServiceIdentify the listening port for WLAvalancheService (typically ports 80, 443, or 8080/8443 for the Avalanche web server) using netstat -an or similar network tools, then determine if the service is accessible from untrusted networksAffected if The WLAvalancheService port is exposed to unauthenticated/untrusted network access without proper firewall restrictions
If Ivanti Avalanche is installed with a version earlier than 6.4.3.528 AND the WLAvalancheService component is active, the environment is vulnerable to unauthenticated memory read attacks via network exposure.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped6.4.3.528
Upgrade Ivanti Avalanche to version 6.4.3 or later to remediate this vulnerability. Until the patch is applied, consider network segmentation and restricting access to the WLAvalancheService to minimize exposure.
Ivanti Avalanche 6.4.3.528 or later
- Back up the current Ivanti Avalanche installation, configuration files, and database before proceeding
- Download Ivanti Avalanche version 6.4.3.528 or later from the official Ivanti support portal (forums.ivanti.com)
- Stop the WLAvalancheService and related Avalanche services
- Install the upgraded Avalanche version following the standard Ivanti upgrade documentation
- Start the Avalanche services and verify the WLAvalancheService component is running
- Confirm the installed version is 6.4.3.528 or higher
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,752.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-23529 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-23529 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data