Path TraversalWeakness · CWE-22

CVE-2024-23540

MEDIUM · 5.3 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-04-03
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
62/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The HCL BigFix Inventory server is vulnerable to path traversal which enables an attacker to read internal application files from the Inventory server. The BigFix Inventory server does not properly restrict the served static file.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

HCL BigFix Inventory server is vulnerable to path traversal, allowing attackers to read internal application files by manipulating file path requests with traversal sequences (e.g., ../). The server does not properly restrict or validate the paths of served static files, enabling unauthorized file system access.

MitigationRestrict path traversal by implementing strict allowlist-based path validation and ensuring requested file paths cannot escape the intended directory boundaries; apply vendor patches when available and restrict server exposure to untrusted networks.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
Low

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify HCL BigFix Inventory installation
    Check for running processes named 'BFI' or 'BigFix Inventory' or look for installation directories such as /opt/BigFixInventory, C:\Program Files\BigFix Inventory, or similar. Use commands like 'ps aux | grep -i bigfix' on Linux or check Services on Windows.
    Affected if HCL BigFix Inventory server is installed and running on the system
  2. Determine installed version
    Locate version information in the installation directory. Common paths include version.txt, about.txt, or the main executable's properties. On Windows check Programs and Features; on Linux check RPM/Debian packages with 'dpkg -l' or 'rpm -qa | grep -i bigfix'.
    Affected if The installed version is unknown or falls within an unpatched version range (check HCL vendor advisories for specific version boundaries)
  3. Check network exposure
    Review firewall rules and server listening ports. Identify if the BigFix Inventory web interface (typically ports 8080, 8443, or custom ports) is exposed to untrusted networks. Use 'netstat -tlnp' or 'ss -tlnp' to list listening services.
    Affected if The BigFix Inventory server is accessible from untrusted networks without proper network segmentation or authentication proxies
  4. Inspect web server configuration
    Examine the BigFix Inventory web server configuration files (commonly in conf/ subdirectory of the installation) for path validation or allowlist settings. Look for parameters controlling static file serving and path traversal protections.
    Affected if Path traversal protection mechanisms (allowlist validation, directory boundary enforcement) are absent or misconfigured in the web server settings

You are affected if HCL BigFix Inventory server is running, exposed to network access, and lacks proper path traversal protection in its configuration.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Restrict path traversal by implementing strict allowlist-based path validation and ensuring requested file paths cannot escape the intended directory boundaries; apply vendor patches when available and restrict server exposure to untrusted networks.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA3.0 h
16.0 hours of engineering $2,820
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,512.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-23540 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-23540 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data