CVE-2024-23551
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedDatabase scanning using username and password stores the credentials in plaintext or encoded format within files at the endpoint. This has been identified as a significant security risk. This will lead to exposure of sensitive information for unauthorized access, potentially leading to severe consequences such as data breaches, unauthorized data manipulation, and compromised system integrity.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceDatabase scanning functionality stores user credentials in plaintext or encoded format within files on the endpoint system. This improper credential storage leads to exposure of sensitive authentication information that could be retrieved by unauthorized parties.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify database scanning tools installedCheck for database scanning utilities or modules on the system. Look for common database scanning tools in common installation directories (e.g., /usr/local/bin, /opt, or via package managers like pip, npm). Run 'which' or 'where' commands for known database scanning tools.Affected if Database scanning functionality is present on the system
-
Locate configuration and cache filesSearch the application data directories for configuration files, cache directories, and temporary files created by database scanning tools. Look in user home directories, /tmp, /var/tmp, and application-specific data folders for files with extensions like .conf, .cfg, .ini, .json, .xml, .log, .cache, or .cred.Affected if Configuration, cache, or log files exist from database scanning operations
-
Examine stored credentialsOpen and inspect the identified configuration, cache, or credential files. Check for fields containing usernames, passwords, API keys, tokens, or connection strings. Determine if the values appear as plaintext strings or are simply encoded (e.g., base64) without encryption.Affected if Credentials are stored in plaintext or encoded (but not encrypted) format within any file
-
Verify credential storage locationDocument the exact file paths where credentials were found. Common locations include config files in the tool's root directory, hidden folders in user home directories, or temporary directories used during scanning operations.Affected if Credentials are found stored in local files on the endpoint system
If database scanning tools are installed and credentials are stored in plaintext or encoded format in local files, the environment is affected by this vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataReplace plaintext/encoded credential storage with secure credential management such as encrypted credential stores, secrets management solutions, or environment variables with proper encryption at rest.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,968.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-23551 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-23551 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data