Dap 1650 FirmwareOperating system · Dlink

CVE-2024-23625

CRITICAL · 9.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-01-26
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A command injection vulnerability exists in D-Link DAP-1650 devices when handling UPnP SUBSCRIBE messages. An unauthenticated attacker can exploit this vulnerability to gain command execution on the device as root.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

A command injection vulnerability exists in D-Link DAP-1650 devices in the UPnP SUBSCRIBE message handling functionality. An unauthenticated attacker can send specially crafted UPnP SUBSCRIBE messages containing shell metacharacters to execute arbitrary commands on the device with root privileges.

MitigationDisable UPnP functionality on the DAP-1650 if not required, or restrict network access to the UPnP service. Network segmentation can limit exposure; contact D-Link for firmware updates.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Dap 1650 FirmwareOperating system
Affected:all versions

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm D-Link DAP-1650 device presence
    Identify D-Link DAP-1650 units on your network by checking device hostname, MAC address prefix (e.g., 1C:AF:F7 for D-Link), or via network scan of model information. Access the device web interface at its LAN IP address and verify the model number in the status or management page.
    Affected if The device model is D-Link DAP-1650 and it is deployed on the network.
  2. Verify UPnP is enabled
    Log into the DAP-1650 web interface (typically at 192.168.0.1 or via DHCP-assigned IP). Navigate to Settings > UPnP or Advanced > UPnP settings. Check if the UPnP enable/checkbox is selected or if UPnP status shows as enabled.
    Affected if UPnP functionality is turned on in the device configuration.
  3. Check UPnP service accessibility
    From a network-connected host, scan the DAP-1650 IP for open UPnP ports. UPnP typically uses port 1900 (UDP) for SSDP and may use HTTP ports for SOAP requests. Use a command such as: nmap -sU -p 1900 <device-ip> or nmap -p 5000,1900 <device-ip> to identify accessible UPnP endpoints.
    Affected if The UPnP service port (1900/UDP or associated HTTP ports) is open and reachable from an untrusted network segment.
  4. Inspect UPnP subscription configuration
    If the UPnP service is running, attempt to interact with it by querying the UPnP device description. Use a tool like upnp-inspector or manually send a M-SEARCH request to the device IP on port 1900 to confirm the UPnP SUBSCRIBE functionality is operational.
    Affected if The device responds to UPnP discovery requests and exposes subscription-capable services.

If you have a D-Link DAP-1650 device with UPnP enabled and the UPnP service is network-accessible, your environment is affected by this vulnerability.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Disable UPnP functionality on the DAP-1650 if not required, or restrict network access to the UPnP service. Network segmentation can limit exposure; contact D-Link for firmware updates.

Fix this in Dap 1650 Firmware Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
10.0 hours of engineering $1,750
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-23625 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-23625 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data