CVE-2024-23692
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedRejetto HTTP File Server, up to and including version 2.3m, is vulnerable to a template injection vulnerability. This vulnerability allows a remote, unauthenticated attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the affected system by sending a specially crafted HTTP request. As of the CVE assignment date, Rejetto HFS 2.3m is no longer supported.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceRejetto HTTP File Server (HFS) up to version 2.3m contains a template injection vulnerability that allows remote, unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary system commands via specially crafted HTTP requests. This critical flaw stems from improper handling of user-supplied input within the application's template engine, enabling complete compromise of the affected system.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 2.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if Rejetto HTTP File Server is runningCheck running processes for 'hfs.exe' or scan for listening ports (default: 80, 443, 8080) using 'netstat -ano | findstr LISTENING'Affected if HFS.exe process is found or HFS-related ports are listening
-
Locate the HFS executable and verify its versionFind the executable file (typically in C:\Program Files\HFS or installation directory), right-click the file, select Properties, and check the 'File version' or 'Product version' field under the Details tabAffected if The reported version is 2.3m or any version up to and including 2.4
-
Check version via web interface if accessibleOpen a browser to the server's IP:port and look for version information in the footer of the main page, or check the HTTP Server header via 'curl -I http://target:port'Affected if Version displayed is 2.3m or any version up to and including 2.4
-
Confirm the template feature is in useVerify the HFS web interface is accessible and serving pages - templates are required for normal HFS operation, so if the web interface works, templates are activeAffected if The HFS web interface loads successfully, indicating templates are enabled and the vulnerability is reachable
The system is affected if Rejetto HTTP File Server version 2.3m or 2.4 is running with the web interface accessible, enabling unauthenticated remote attackers to execute commands via template injection.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade to a supported version of Rejetto HFS if available; if no supported version exists, discontinue use of this software and migrate to an alternative file server solution. As an interim control, restrict network access to the HFS service to trusted IP addresses only.
Rejetto HFS version 2.4 or later
- 1. Back up your current HFS configuration and any hosted files.
- 2. Download the latest version of Rejetto HTTP File Server (version 2.4 or later) from the official repository at github.com/rejetto/hfs
- 3. Stop the currently running HFS service.
- 4. Install or replace the existing HFS installation with the new version.
- 5. Restore your backed-up configuration if needed.
- 6. Start the HFS service and verify it is functioning correctly.
- 7. Test that the vulnerability is patched by confirming the template injection is no longer exploitable.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-23692 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-23692 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data