CVE-2024-23788
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedServer-side request forgery vulnerability in Energy Management Controller with Cloud Services JH-RVB1 /JH-RV11 Ver.B0.1.9.1 and earlier allows a network-adjacent unauthenticated attacker to send an arbitrary HTTP request (GET) from the affected product.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceServer-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Energy Management Controller JH-RVB1/JH-RV11 allows a network-adjacent unauthenticated attacker to send arbitrary HTTP GET requests from the affected device. This can be exploited to interact with internal systems, bypass network boundaries, or exfiltrate data via the compromised device.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= b0.1.9.1<= b0.1.9.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the device model on the networkAccess the device web interface or check the device label/metadata to confirm the model is JH-RVB1 or JH-RV11Affected if The device model is Sharp JH-RVB1 or JH-RV11 and is network-accessible
-
Check the installed firmware versionLog into the device admin interface and navigate to the firmware or system information page to view the current firmware version numberAffected if The firmware version is b0.1.9.1 or lower (any version <= b0.1.9.1)
-
Verify the HTTP management interface is exposedAttempt to access the device web interface on common HTTP ports (80, 8080) from a network-adjacent host to confirm the service is listeningAffected if The device HTTP service is accessible from an untrusted network segment
-
Review network logs for suspicious outbound HTTP requestsMonitor network traffic or firewall logs for the device initiating HTTP GET requests to internal IP ranges, unusual external domains, or known internal servicesAffected if The device is making outbound HTTP requests to internal infrastructure without legitimate cause
-
Check for unauthorized internal network probingReview intrusion detection logs or internal network monitoring for signs that the device has scanned internal systems or attempted connections to internal servicesAffected if The device shows evidence of sending arbitrary HTTP requests to internal systems
A user is affected if they have a JH-RVB1 or JH-RV11 device running firmware version b0.1.9.1 or lower that is accessible on the network and the SSRF vulnerability can be exploited to proxy requests from the device.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedIsolate the affected device on a restricted network segment with strict firewall rules, and monitor for indicators of compromise. Apply vendor patches when available.
Firmware version newer than B0.1.9.1 (e.g., B0.1.9.2 or latest available)
- 1. Identify the specific model of your Sharp Energy Management Controller (JH-RVB1 or JH-RV11)
- 2. Visit the official Sharp support website (jp.sharp) or contact Sharp support to obtain the latest firmware version
- 3. Download the firmware update file from the official Sharp source
- 4. Follow the manufacturer's firmware update instructions specific to your device model
- 5. Verify the firmware version after updating to confirm the fix is applied
- 6. Ensure the device is updated to a version newer than B0.1.9.1 (e.g., B0.1.9.2 or later)
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-23788 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-23788 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data