Incorrect Default PermissionsWeakness · CWE-276

CVE-2024-23847

MEDIUM · 5.9 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-05-31
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
64/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Incorrect default permissions issue exists in Unifier and Unifier Cast. If this vulnerability is exploited, arbitrary code may be executed with LocalSystem privilege. As a result, a malicious program may be installed, data may be altered or deleted.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Incorrect default permissions in Unifier and Unifier Cast allow arbitrary code execution with LocalSystem privileges. The vulnerability stems from improper permission configuration on the application or its components, enabling a local attacker to potentially install malicious programs or modify/delete data.

MitigationApply vendor-supplied patches or security updates that correct the default permission settings. If no patch available, manually review and restrict file system and service permissions to follow least-privilege principles.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
Low

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Detect Unifier installation
    Search for Unifier or Unifier Cast installation directories. Common locations include C:\Program Files\Unifier or C:\Program Files (x86)\Unifier. Also check for Unifier Cast in similar paths. Use commands like dir /s /b "C:\Program Files\*Unifier*" or check Windows Registry under HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall for entries containing 'Unifier'.
    Affected if Unifier or Unifier Cast software is found installed on the system
  2. Check file system permissions on application directory
    Review permissions on the detected Unifier installation folder. Use icacls command on the main application directory (e.g., icacls "C:\Program Files\Unifier"). Verify that non-admin users do not have Full Control or Modify permissions. Check for Everyone, Users, or Authenticated Users with excessive permissions.
    Affected if Users other than Administrators or SYSTEM have Full Control or Modify permissions on the application directory or its subdirectories
  3. Inspect service configuration
    Check if Unifier runs as a Windows service. Run sc queryex type= service state= all | findstr /i "Unifier" to enumerate Unifier services. Then use sc qc <service_name> to query the service configuration and check the binary path. Use icacls on the service executable to verify permissions.
    Affected if Unifier runs as a Windows service with LocalSystem privileges and the service executable or configuration files have weak permissions
  4. Check for executable file permissions
    Identify all .exe and .dll files within the Unifier installation directory. Use icacls on key executables (e.g., icacls "C:\Program Files\Unifier\*.exe") to review who can read, write, or execute these files. Look for writable locations that could be replaced with malicious code.
    Affected if Non-privileged users have Write or Modify access to executable files within the Unifier installation directory

The environment is affected if Unifier or Unifier Cast is installed and either the application directory or its executables have overly permissive file system ACLs allowing non-admin users to modify or execute code with elevated (LocalSystem) privileges.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply vendor-supplied patches or security updates that correct the default permission settings. If no patch available, manually review and restrict file system and service permissions to follow least-privilege principles.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
22.0 hours of engineering $3,860
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-23847 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-23847 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data