Data Center Gpu Max 1100 FirmwareOperating system · Intel

CVE-2024-24580

MEDIUM · 5.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-08-14
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
57/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Improper conditions check in some Intel(R) Data Center GPU Max Series 1100 and 1550 products may allow a privileged user to potentially enable denial of service via local access.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Intel Data Center GPU Max Series 1100 and 1550 products contain an improper conditions check vulnerability that allows a privileged user with local access to potentially cause a denial of service. This is a logic error in condition validation within the GPU firmware or driver software.

MitigationApply Intel-provided firmware/software updates for the Data Center GPU Max Series when available. Restrict local access to trusted privileged users and monitor for signs of DoS conditions on affected GPU systems.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Data Center Gpu Max 1100 FirmwareOperating system
Affected:all versions
Data Center Gpu Max 1550 FirmwareOperating system
Affected:all versions

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Intel Data Center GPU Max model
    Run 'lspci | grep -i vga' or 'lspci | grep -i gpu' to list GPU hardware. Look for 'Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100' or 'Intel Data Center GPU Max 1550' in the output.
    Affected if The system contains an Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100 or 1550 device.
  2. Check GPU firmware version
    Use Intel GPU management tool such as 'xpu-smi' if installed: run 'xpu-smi device-info' or 'xpu-smi list'. Otherwise check system firmware/BIOS tools or Intel GPU deployment documentation for firmware version retrieval methods.
    Affected if Any firmware version is reported on a Data Center GPU Max 1100 or 1550 (all versions are affected).
  3. Verify presence of local privileged access
    Review system user accounts and group memberships with access to GPU management interfaces. Check if non-administrator users have permissions to execute GPU management commands or access GPU device files in /dev.
    Affected if Multiple local users or groups have privileged access to GPU management interfaces without strict access controls.
  4. Check for GPU management software
    List installed Intel GPU software packages: on Linux run 'dpkg -l | grep -i intel' or 'rpm -qa | grep -i intel'. Look for GPU driver packages, oneAPI, or compute runtime components.
    Affected if Intel GPU driver or compute runtime software for Data Center GPU Max series is installed.
  5. Monitor for GPU denial of service indicators
    Check system logs (/var/log/messages, journalctl) and GPU-specific logs for repeated failures, hangs, or reset events. Run 'xpu-smi diag' if available to check GPU health status.
    Affected if Repeated GPU reset events, hang notifications, or error messages involving the Intel Data Center GPU appear in logs.

A system is affected if it contains an Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100 or 1550 with any firmware version and has local privileged users who could trigger the logic error in condition validation.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply Intel-provided firmware/software updates for the Data Center GPU Max Series when available. Restrict local access to trusted privileged users and monitor for signs of DoS conditions on affected GPU systems.

Fix this in Data Center Gpu Max 1100 Firmware Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
18.0 hours of engineering $3,200
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-24580 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-24580 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data