Setka WorkflowWordPress extension · Tiny
CVE-2024-24701
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Native Grid LLC A no-code page builder for beautiful performance-based content.This issue affects A no-code page builder for beautiful performance-based content: from n/a through 2.1.20.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Native Grid LLC's no-code page builder allows attackers to trick authenticated users into unknowingly executing unintended actions (such as modifying page content, settings, or configurations) by leveraging the application's trust in the user's authenticated session.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data
Setka WorkflowWordPress extension
<= 2.1.20CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed versionLocate the version number of Tiny Setka Workflow in your plugin/theme system, WordPress admin panel, or version file, and compare it against the affected range (<= 2.1.20)Affected if The installed version is 2.1.20 or earlier
-
Inspect for anti-CSRF tokensExamine the application's forms and state-changing requests (such as those modifying page content, settings, or configurations) to determine whether anti-CSRF tokens are being generated and validated with each operationAffected if State-changing operations lack anti-CSRF token validation
-
Verify SameSite cookie attributesInspect session and authentication cookies for the SameSite attribute using browser developer tools or network inspection, and check if they are set to 'Strict' or 'Lax'Affected if Cookies lack SameSite attribute or are set to 'None' without secure flag
-
Confirm Origin/Referer header validationTest whether the application validates the Origin or Referer header on state-changing requests by submitting requests from an untrusted source and observing if they are rejectedAffected if Requests from untrusted origins are accepted without validation
You are affected if Tiny Setka Workflow version is 2.1.20 or earlier AND the application lacks anti-CSRF protection on state-changing operations.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement anti-CSRF tokens for all state-changing operations, configure SameSite cookie attributes, and verify Origin/Referer headers to ensure requests originate from trusted sources.
Fix this in Setka Workflow
Scoped from the published advisory
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,848.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-24701 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-24701 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data