CVE-2024-24763
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedJumpServer is an open source bastion host and an operation and maintenance security audit system. Prior to version 3.10.0, attackers can exploit this vulnerability to construct malicious links, leading users to click on them, thereby facilitating phishing attacks or cross-site scripting attacks. Version 3.10.0 contains a patch for this issue. No known workarounds are available.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceJumpServer versions prior to 3.10.0 contain a vulnerability that allows attackers to craft malicious links. When users click these links, they can be directed to phishing sites or have malicious scripts executed via cross-site scripting (XSS). The vulnerability is link-based, suggesting it may involve insufficient URL sanitization or an open redirect that can be chained with XSS.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 3.10.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify JumpServer installationLocate JumpServer installation directory or check running services that may be running JumpServer. Common locations include /opt/jumpserver or /usr/local/jumpserver. Check if the jumpserver process is running.Affected if JumpServer is installed and running in the environment
-
Determine installed JumpServer versionCheck the version file or configuration within the JumpServer installation. Typically found in a version file, changelog, or within the application's web interface. Common paths include /opt/jumpserver/apps/jumpserver/conf.py or check the docker image tag if running containers.Affected if Unable to determine version or version displayed is below 3.10.0
-
Compare version against affected rangeReview the identified version number. Compare it to the vulnerable threshold: versions prior to 3.10.0 are affected.Affected if Installed version is lower than 3.10.0 (e.g., 3.9.x, 3.8.x, 3.7.x, etc.)
-
Verify URL handling behavior (optional)If accessible, test the application's redirect behavior by observing how the application handles URLs in query parameters or links. Note: Do not perform active exploitation; only observe existing behavior.Affected if Application allows arbitrary URL redirects or insufficient URL sanitization is observable in link generation
The environment is affected if JumpServer is installed and the running version is any release prior to version 3.10.0.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped3.10.0
Upgrade JumpServer to version 3.10.0 or later. No workarounds are available, so immediate patching is required.
3.10.0
- Upgrade JumpServer to version 3.10.0 or later to remediate the open redirect vulnerability
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-24763 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-24763 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data