CVE-2024-25006
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedXenForo before 2.2.14 allows Directory Traversal (with write access) by an authenticated user who has permissions to administer styles, and uses a ZIP archive for Styles Import.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceXenForo before version 2.2.14 contains a directory traversal vulnerability in the Styles Import functionality. An authenticated user with permissions to administer styles can craft a malicious ZIP archive containing file paths with traversal sequences (e.g., ../../../) to write files to arbitrary locations on the server filesystem outside the intended styles directory.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 2.2.14CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check XenForo versionNavigate to the XenForo admin control panel, then go to Options > Basic Board Information, or inspect the file src/addons/XenForo/Setup/Version.php or the version info displayed in the admin footerAffected if The installed version is lower than 2.2.14
-
Identify users with Style administration permissionsIn the admin control panel, go to Users > Permissions > User Groups or Users > Administrators and review which users or groups have the 'style' or 'styleAdmin' permission enabledAffected if Any user account other than the primary administrator has style administration permissions
-
Review recent style importsIn the admin control panel, go to Appearance > Styles and examine the import history. Check for any styles imported from ZIP files that were not sourced from the official XenForo resource libraryAffected if Styles were imported from untrusted or third-party ZIP archives
-
Inspect imported style files for traversal sequencesIf style imports exist, examine the ZIP files in the internal_data directory or extracted style directories for file paths containing ../ sequences. Check files like template.xml or less templates for anomalous path referencesAffected if Any style files contain directory traversal sequences like ../ in file paths
-
Check server filesystem for unexpected filesReview the XenForo root directory and parent directories for newly created files that do not belong to the XenForo installation, particularly PHP files or configuration files that may have been written via the traversal vulnerabilityAffected if Unexpected files exist outside the intended styles directory structure
You are affected if your XenForo installation is version 2.2.13 or earlier AND any user with style administration permissions imported a ZIP file from an untrusted source.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2.2.14
Upgrade XenForo to version 2.2.14 or later. As an interim measure, restrict style administration permissions to only highly trusted administrators and review existing style imports for suspicious content.
XenForo 2.2.14
- Create a complete backup of your XenForo database and all files
- Download XenForo version 2.2.14 or later from the official XenForo members area
- Upload the new XenForo 2.2.14 files to your server, overwriting the existing installation
- Run the upgrade by visiting your forum URL (the system will automatically apply any necessary database updates)
- Clear all caches via the XenForo admin control panel under Tools > Cache
- Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the version number in the admin control panel
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-25006 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-25006 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data