CVE-2024-25009
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedEricsson Packet Core Controller (PCC) contains a vulnerability in Access and Mobility Management Function (AMF) where improper input validation can lead to denial of service which may result in service degradation.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceEricsson Packet Core Controller's Access and Mobility Management Function (AMF) contains improper input validation that can be exploited to cause denial of service, resulting in service degradation. The vulnerability allows attackers to send specially crafted input to trigger the condition.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Ericsson Packet Core Controller AMF deploymentInventory your telecom core network infrastructure to identify if Ericsson Packet Core Controller with the Access and Mobility Management Function (AMF) component is deployedAffected if Your environment contains Ericsson Packet Core Controller with AMF module
-
Assess AMF network accessibilityReview network diagrams and firewall rules to determine if the AMF service interface is reachable from external or untrusted network segmentsAffected if AMF interface is exposed to network paths accessible by potential attackers outside the trusted core
-
Locate AMF version informationCheck system documentation, version logs, or package manifests for the installed Ericsson Packet Core Controller AMF versionAffected if You cannot verify the installed version or the version lags behind vendor releases
-
Inspect AMF input validation configurationReview AMF configuration files and settings related to input validation, message parsing, and request handlingAffected if Default input validation settings are in use without additional vendor-recommended safeguards
You are affected if Ericsson Packet Core Controller AMF is deployed and the AMF interface is accessible to untrusted network sources, regardless of version verification status
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply Ericsson-provided patches for Packet Core Controller; implement additional input validation safeguards at network perimeter as defense-in-depth until vendor fix is available.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing16.0 h
- Review / QA8.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $11,520.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-25009 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-25009 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data