CVE-2024-25149
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedLiferay Portal 7.2.0 through 7.4.1, and older unsupported versions, and Liferay DXP 7.3 before service pack 3, 7.2 before fix pack 15, and older unsupported versions does not properly restrict membership of a child site when the "Limit membership to members of the parent site" option is enabled, which allows remote authenticated users to add users who are not a member of the parent site to a child site. The added user may obtain permission to perform unauthorized actions in the child site.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceLifter Portal and DXP contain an authorization bypass in site membership logic. When the 'Limit membership to members of the parent site' option is enabled for a child site, the application fails to properly validate that added users are actually members of the parent site, allowing authenticated attackers to add arbitrary users to child sites and potentially escalate privileges.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 7.2= 7.2= 7.3< 7.4.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine installed Lifer Portal or DXP versionLocate the version information in the Lifer installation. Common locations: the portal-ext.properties file, the Lifer Database (version table in the release_ table), or the OSGi bundle information via the Gogo shell command 'lb | grep liferay'. Compare against the affected ranges: DXP versions 7.2, 7.3 (any patch level) and Portal versions before 7.4.2.Affected if The installed version falls within 7.2, 7.3, or any version before 7.4.2 for Portal.
-
Identify child sites with parent site membership restriction enabledQuery the Lifer database for sites where the setting 'limitMembershipToParentSiteMembers' is true, or use the Lifer UI: go to Site Administration > Sites, select each child site, navigate to Membership > Site Membership Settings, and check if 'Limit membership to members of the parent site' is toggled on.Affected if Any child site has the 'Limit membership to members of the parent site' option enabled.
-
Audit members of restricted child sites against parent site membershipFor each child site with the restriction enabled, retrieve the list of members via Site Administration > Membership > Site Members. Then retrieve the members of the parent site. Compare the two lists to identify any users present in the child site who are NOT present in the parent site.Affected if A child site has members that are not also members of its parent site, indicating the authorization bypass was exploited.
You are affected if your Lifer Portal/DXP version is 7.2, 7.3, or any version before 7.4.2 AND you have child sites with the parent site membership restriction enabled that contain unauthorized members.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped7.27.4.2
Upgrade to Lifer Portal 7.4.2 or later, or apply Lifer DXP 7.3 service pack 3 / 7.2 fix pack 15 or later. Alternatively, audit existing child site memberships and remove unauthorized members.
L Portal 7.4.2+ / DXP 7.2 Fix Pack 15+ / DXP 7.3 Service Pack 3+
- 1. Identify the current L Portal or DXP version by checking the Control Panel > Configuration > Server Administration > Version
- 2. For L Portal 7.2.x through 7.4.1: upgrade to L Portal 7.4.2 or later
- 3. For DXP 7.2.x: apply Fix Pack 15 or later
- 4. For DXP 7.3.x: apply Service Pack 3 or later
- 5. After upgrading, verify the "Limit membership to members of the parent site" option works correctly in Site Settings > Membership Policy > Site Members
- 6. Test adding a user who is NOT a member of the parent site to confirm the vulnerability is remediated
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,808.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-25149 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-25149 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data