CVE-2024-2530
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability was found in MAGESH-K21 Online-College-Event-Hall-Reservation-System 1.0. It has been rated as problematic. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file /admin/update-rooms.php. The manipulation of the argument id leads to cross site scripting. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The associated identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-256967. NOTE: The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the /admin/update-rooms.php file of the MAGESH-K21 Online-College-Event-Hall-Reservation-System 1.0. The 'id' parameter is not properly sanitized before being included in the response, allowing an attacker to inject malicious JavaScript code that executes in the victim's browser when they interact with the crafted URL.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm MAGESH-K21 Online College Event Hall Reservation System is installedLocate the application files on the server - look for directories containing 'update-rooms.php' or the application's web rootAffected if The application is present on the server
-
Verify the application versionCheck any version file, README, or meta information within the application installation directoryAffected if The installed version is 1.0
-
Confirm vulnerable file existsCheck if /admin/update-rooms.php exists in the web root of the applicationAffected if The file /admin/update-rooms.php exists in the application directory
-
Inspect the 'id' parameter handling in update-rooms.phpOpen /admin/update-rooms.php and locate the code that handles the 'id' parameter - check if it is directly included in the response without sanitization or encodingAffected if The 'id' parameter is echoed back to the user without proper input validation or output encoding
A user is affected if the MAGESH-K21 Online College Event Hall Reservation System version 1.0 is installed and the /admin/update-rooms.php file exists with the 'id' parameter being reflected without sanitization.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedImplement proper input validation and output encoding for the 'id' parameter in update-rooms.php. Use context-appropriate encoding when reflecting user input back to the browser, and consider implementing Content Security Policy (CSP) headers as a defense-in-depth measure.
- 1. Locate the file /admin/update-rooms.php in the application directory
- 2. Find the code that handles the 'id' parameter (typically from $_GET, $_POST, or $_REQUEST)
- 3. Apply output encoding using htmlspecialchars() or htmlentities() when displaying the id value. For example: $id = htmlspecialchars($_GET['id'], ENT_QUOTES, 'UTF-8');
- 4. Additionally, implement input validation: validate that 'id' contains only expected characters (e.g., alphanumeric) using preg_match() or filter_var()
- 5. For stored XSS prevention, also sanitize before database storage using prepared statements
- 6. Add a Content-Security-Policy (CSP) header in the server configuration or PHP to restrict inline scripts: Header set Content-Security-Policy "default-src 'self'; script-src 'self'"
- 7. Test the fix by attempting XSS payloads in the id parameter (e.g., <script>alert('XSS')</script>)
- 8. Apply same sanitization to all user-supplied inputs throughout the application
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-2530 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-2530 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data