CVE-2024-2551
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA null pointer dereference vulnerability in Palo Alto Networks PAN-OS software enables an unauthenticated attacker to stop a core system service on the firewall by sending a crafted packet through the data plane that causes a denial of service (DoS) condition. Repeated attempts to trigger this condition result in the firewall entering maintenance mode.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA null pointer dereference vulnerability in PAN-OS allows unauthenticated attackers to send crafted packets through the data plane, causing a core system service to crash and resulting in denial of service. Repeated exploitation forces the firewall into maintenance mode.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 10.1.0, < 10.1.14>= 10.2.0, < 10.2.4>= 11.0.0, < 11.0.5= 10.2.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine the PAN-OS versionLog into the firewall CLI and run 'show system info' or use the web GUI under Device > Setup > Operations > Show System Info to locate the PAN-OS version fieldAffected if The version displayed falls within these ranges: 10.1.0 to 10.1.13, 10.2.0 to 10.2.3, 10.2.4, or 11.0.0 to 11.0.4
-
Verify management and data plane exposureReview network configuration to confirm whether the firewall management interface or untrust-zone interfaces are directly accessible from untrusted or external networksAffected if The management interface or data plane interfaces with the vulnerable service are reachable from untrusted networks without filtering
-
Check for service crashes or maintenance mode eventsIn the firewall CLI, run 'show system log-files' or review system logs for entries indicating core services have crashed, or check if the device recently entered maintenance mode unexpectedlyAffected if Logs show core system service crashes or the device was forced into maintenance mode without administrative action
-
Inspect data plane packet processingMonitor network traffic logs or run 'show session all' to observe if unusual or crafted packets from untrusted sources are being processed by the data planeAffected if The firewall is actively processing untrusted traffic that could trigger the null pointer dereference
A user is affected if their PAN-OS version falls within the affected ranges (10.1.0-10.1.13, 10.2.0-10.2.3, 10.2.4, or 11.0.0-11.0.4) AND the firewall management or data plane interfaces are exposed to untrusted network traffic.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped10.1.1410.2.411.0.5
Apply the vendor patch for CVE-2024-2551; until patched, consider network segmentation or filtering to limit exposure to untrusted traffic sources.
PAN-OS 10.1.14 (for 10.1.x branch); PAN-OS 10.2.5 or later (for 10.2.x branch); PAN-OS 11.0.5 or later (for 11.0.x branch)
- 1. Identify the current PAN-OS version running on the firewall using the web interface (Device > Runtime Stats) or CLI: show system info
- 2. Determine which version branch (10.1.x, 10.2.x, or 11.0.x) the current installation falls into
- 3. For PAN-OS 10.1.x (versions 10.1.0-10.1.13): Schedule a maintenance window and upgrade to PAN-OS 10.1.14 or later
- 4. For PAN-OS 10.2.x (versions 10.2.0-10.2.4): Schedule a maintenance window and upgrade to PAN-OS 10.2.5 or later
- 5. For PAN-OS 11.0.x (versions 11.0.0-11.0.4): Schedule a maintenance window and upgrade to PAN-OS 11.0.5 or later
- 6. Before upgrading, review Palo Alto Networks pre-upgrade checklist and backup the firewall configuration
- 7. After upgrade, verify the firewall is operational and core services are running
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,816.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-2551 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-2551 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data