Distributed EngineApplication · Delinea

CVE-2024-25650

MEDIUM · 5.9 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-03-14
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
68/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Insecure key exchange between Delinea PAM Secret Server 11.4 and the Distributed Engine 8.4.3 allows a PAM administrator to obtain the Symmetric Key (used to encrypt RabbitMQ messages) via crafted payloads to the /pre-authenticate, /authenticate, and /execute-and-respond REST API endpoints. This makes it possible for a PAM administrator to impersonate the Engine and exfiltrate sensitive information from the messages published in the RabbitMQ exchanges, without being audited in the application.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

The vulnerability exists in the insecure key exchange mechanism between Delinea PAM Secret Server 11.4 and Distributed Engine 8.4.3. A PAM administrator can obtain the symmetric key (used to encrypt RabbitMQ messages) through crafted payloads sent to the /pre-authenticate, /authenticate, and /execute-and-respond REST API endpoints. This allows the administrator to impersonate the Distributed Engine and exfiltrate sensitive data from RabbitMQ message exchanges while evading application auditing.

MitigationApply the vendor-supplied patch or upgrade to a patched version of both Secret Server and Distributed Engine. As a precautionary measure, rotate all symmetric keys used for RabbitMQ message encryption after applying the update.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Distributed EngineApplication
Affected:= 8.4.3
Secret ServerApplication
Affected:= 11.4.000000

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
High
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Secret Server version
    Log into the Secret Server administrative interface and navigate to Help > About, or check the version displayed in the Secret Server dashboard
    Affected if Version shown is 11.4.000000 exactly
  2. Identify Distributed Engine version
    Open Secret Server admin panel, go to Administration > Distributed Engine > Engines, and check the version column for installed engines
    Affected if Any engine shows version 8.4.3 exactly
  3. Verify REST API endpoint exposure
    Check network configuration or web server logs for access to /pre-authenticate, /authenticate, and /execute-and-respond endpoints on the Secret Server or Distributed Engine
    Affected if These endpoints are accessible from untrusted networks without additional authentication controls
  4. Review for key compromise indicators
    Examine application logs for unusual authentication attempts, especially any instances where symmetric keys appear in logs or where engine authentication patterns deviate from baseline
    Affected if Symmetric key material or abnormal engine authentication events appear in logs

You are affected if your environment contains both Secret Server 11.4.000000 and Distributed Engine 8.4.3 with accessible REST API endpoints.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply the vendor-supplied patch or upgrade to a patched version of both Secret Server and Distributed Engine. As a precautionary measure, rotate all symmetric keys used for RabbitMQ message encryption after applying the update.

Fix this in Distributed Engine Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing8.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
20.0 hours of engineering $3,440
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,504.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-25650 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-25650 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data