ZenmlApplication

CVE-2024-25723

HIGH · 8.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-02-27
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 0.42.2 / 0.44.4 or later.
See remediation →
94/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
High EPSS Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
ZenML Server in the ZenML machine learning package before 0.46.7 for Python allows remote privilege escalation because the /api/v1/users/{user_name_or_id}/activate REST API endpoint allows access on the basis of a valid username along with a new password in the request body. These are also patched versions: 0.44.4, 0.43.1, and 0.42.2.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The ZenML Server /api/v1/users/{user_name_or_id}/activate endpoint allows remote privilege escalation by accepting a valid username along with a new password in the request body without requiring proper authentication. An unauthenticated attacker can reset any user's password and take over their account, including administrative accounts.

MitigationUpgrade ZenML to version 0.46.7 or later (or to patched versions 0.44.4, 0.43.1, or 0.42.2). The fix should enforce proper authentication and authorization checks before allowing password changes on the activation endpoint.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
ZenmlApplication
Affected:< 0.42.2>= 0.44.0, < 0.44.4>= 0.45.0, < 0.46.7= 0.43.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the installed ZenML version
    Run `zenml version` or check the Python package version with `pip show zenml`
    Affected if The version is < 0.42.2, = 0.43.0, >= 0.44.0 and < 0.44.4, or >= 0.45.0 and < 0.46.7
  2. Confirm the ZenML server is running
    Check for running processes: `ps aux | grep zenml` or check if the server API is listening on its port (default 8080) with `netstat -tlnp | grep 8080`
    Affected if The server is running and the version is in the affected range above
  3. Verify the activation endpoint is exposed
    Attempt a GET request to `http://<server>/api/v1/users/{任意用户名}/activate` without providing authentication credentials
    Affected if The endpoint returns a valid HTTP response (rather than 401/403) indicating it is accessible without authentication
  4. Check for recent authentication logs
    Review server logs for unauthenticated or failed login attempts to the `/activate` endpoint using `grep -i activate /var/log/zenml/*.log` or equivalent log location
    Affected if Unauthenticated requests to the activation endpoint appear in logs, confirming the vulnerability is accessible

You are affected if the ZenML server is running with a version in the vulnerable range AND the activation endpoint is accessible without authentication.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 0.42.2 / 0.44.4 / 0.46.7 or later
Fixed in 0.42.20.44.40.46.7
Interim mitigation

Upgrade ZenML to version 0.46.7 or later (or to patched versions 0.44.4, 0.43.1, or 0.42.2). The fix should enforce proper authentication and authorization checks before allowing password changes on the activation endpoint.

Recommended fix High confidence

0.46.7 (or latest 0.46.x release)

  1. Check current ZenML version using: pip show zenml or zenml version
  2. Upgrade to the fixed version 0.46.7 using: pip install zenml==0.46.7
  3. Verify the upgrade was successful by running: zenml version
  4. Ensure the server is restarted after upgrading to load the patched code

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Zenml Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
10.0 hours of engineering $1,770
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,832.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-25723 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-25723 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data