CVE-2024-25915
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedServer-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Raaj Trambadia Pexels: Free Stock Photos.This issue affects Pexels: Free Stock Photos: from n/a through 1.2.2.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceServer-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the Pexels WordPress plugin versions up to 1.2.2 allows attackers to induce the server to make arbitrary HTTP requests to attacker-controlled or internal destinations, potentially accessing internal services, cloud metadata endpoints, or bypassing network restrictions.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 1.2.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Pexels plugin installationNavigate to WordPress admin dashboard > Plugins > Installed Plugins and locate 'Pexels' by RaajtramAffected if The Raajtram Pexels plugin is present in the WordPress installation
-
Verify plugin versionIn the Plugins list, find the Pexels plugin version column or click on the plugin to view detailsAffected if Installed version is 1.2.2 or lower
-
Check if plugin is activeIn WordPress admin > Plugins, verify whether the Pexels plugin is currently activatedAffected if Plugin is active and can make HTTP requests
-
Inspect plugin for URL handling functionalityAccess the plugin settings page and review any features that accept or process URLs, such as image search or API configuration fieldsAffected if Plugin contains input fields that accept URLs for server-side processing
If the Raajtram Pexels plugin version 1.2.2 or lower is installed and active with URL-handling features enabled, the environment is affected by this SSRF vulnerability
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedImplement strict URL allowlisting and validate all user-supplied URLs before making server-side requests, restricting destinations to trusted domains only; disable unnecessary URL protocols and ensure proper input sanitization.
Update to the latest version available in the WordPress plugin repository (check wordpress.org for the current stable release)
- Log in to the WordPress admin dashboard
- Navigate to Plugins > Installed Plugins
- Find the 'Pexels: Free Stock Photos' plugin
- Check if an update is available (compare current version 1.2.2 with the latest version shown)
- If a newer version is available, click 'Update Now' to upgrade to the latest version
- After updating, verify the plugin is functioning correctly by testing photo searches
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-25915 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-25915 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data