CVE-2024-26035
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAdobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.19 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by an attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim’s browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceAdobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.19 and earlier contain a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability where malicious JavaScript can be injected into form fields and persists in the system, executing in victims' browsers when they view pages containing the affected fields.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 6.5.20.0< 2024.3.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Adobe Experience Manager versionAccess the AEM Welcome page or check the crx/com.sun.jmx.mbeanserver.MBeanSafeControl MBean via the Felix console at /system/console/mbeans, or query the version via the OSGi bundle console at /system/console/bundlesAffected if Installed version is below 6.5.20.0 or below 2024.3.0 (for cloud/2024 releases)
-
Identify custom form componentsReview the /apps directory in CRX/DE for custom form components, specifically Adaptive Form fragments, Core Components form fields, or custom form containers that accept user input and store data in the repositoryAffected if Custom or Core Components form fields are in use that do not have output encoding applied to submitted values
-
Inspect form field data in repositoryQuery the repository using CRXDE Lite (at /crx/de) or the Query Builder API to examine stored values in form-related content nodes (look in /content, /etc, or custom form model nodes) for suspicious script tags, JavaScript: URLs, or event handlersAffected if Form field data contains unsanitized HTML or script tags that could execute in a user's browser
-
Check for Content Services or Form Data Model usageReview whether Forms Data Model (FDM), Adaptive Forms, or custom form submissions are configured to persist data without server-side validation - check /content/forms/af or similar pathsAffected if Form data is persisted directly without input validation or output encoding applied before rendering
You are affected if your AEM version is below 6.5.20.0 (or below 2024.3.0 for cloud) AND you have form fields in use that store user input without proper sanitization.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped6.5.20.02024.3.0
Update Adobe Experience Manager to a version newer than 6.5.19, or implement strict input validation and output encoding on vulnerable form fields to prevent script injection.
AEM 6.5.20.0 or AEM 2024.3.0
- Backup the current AEM instance and content repository before starting the upgrade process
- Review the Adobe Experience Manager upgrade documentation for the target version (6.5.20.0 or 2024.3.0)
- Test the upgrade in a non-production environment first to identify any compatibility issues
- Perform the upgrade following Adobe's recommended upgrade procedures for AEM as specified in the official documentation
- After upgrade, verify the AEM version is correct by navigating to Help > About Adobe Experience Manager
- Clear the AEM cache and rebuild any custom indexes if necessary
- Test that the XSS fix is working by verifying that malicious scripts cannot be injected into form fields
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-26035 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-26035 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data