CVE-2024-26055
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAdobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.20 and earlier are affected by a DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. This vulnerability could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary JavaScript code in the context of the victim's browser session. Exploitation of this issue typically requires user interaction, such as convincing a victim to click on a specially crafted link or to submit a form that triggers the malicious script.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceAdobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.20 and earlier contain a DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that allows attackers to execute arbitrary JavaScript in victim's browsers via malicious links or forms. The attack requires user interaction to trigger.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 6.5.21< 2024.5CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Locate AEM version informationAccess the AEM Welcome page at /libs/cq/core/content/welcome.html or check the version displayed in the AEM login screen footer. Alternatively, check the version.properties file located in the crx-quickstart/conf directory.Affected if The displayed version is 6.5.20 or earlier, or the version is a 2024.x release earlier than 2024.5.
-
Verify exact AEM version via System ConsoleNavigate to /system/console/bundles and look for the 'Adobe Experience Manager' or 'com.day.cq' bundle entries in the bundle list. The version is also visible in the AEM startup logs under crx-quickstart/logs/error.log.Affected if The version number shown is below 6.5.21 for the 6.5.x branch, or below 2024.5 for the newer release cadence.
-
Identify if the vulnerable endpoint is accessibleCheck whether unauthenticated or low-privilege users can access endpoints that handle user-supplied input without proper encoding, particularly custom components or third-party integrations that render content in the DOM.Affected if The AEM instance exposes web content endpoints that accept user input and render it back without sufficient output encoding.
-
Check for recent security-related hotfixesReview installed AEM hotfixes in the Package Manager (accessible via /crx/packmgr/list.jsp) or the System Console's Product Info tab (/system/console/productinfo) to see if CVE-2024-26055-specific patches have been applied.Affected if No security hotfix addressing CVE-2024-26055 is installed and the AEM version falls within the affected ranges.
An AEM installation is affected if it runs version 6.5.20 or earlier in the 6.5.x branch, or any version prior to 2024.5 in the newer release cadence, and exposes endpoints that render user input without proper output encoding.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped6.5.212024.5
Upgrade AEM to a version newer than 6.5.20. Additionally, implement input validation and output encoding on affected endpoints to mitigate XSS vectors.
Adobe Experience Manager 6.5.21 (for 6.5.x line) or Adobe Experience Manager 2024.5 (for as a Cloud Service)
- 1. Back up your current AEM instance and verify backup integrity before proceeding.
- 2. Review Adobe's official upgrade documentation for Experience Manager at helpx.adobe.com.
- 3. For AEM 6.5.x line: Upgrade to version 6.5.21 or later.
- 4. For AEM as a Cloud Service: Upgrade to version 2024.5 or later.
- 5. After upgrade, verify the XSS vulnerability is resolved by testing with the identified attack vectors.
- 6. Validate that custom code and integrations function correctly post-upgrade.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-26055 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-26055 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data