CVE-2024-26061
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAdobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.19 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by an attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim’s browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceAdobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.19 and earlier contain a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability where malicious scripts can be injected into vulnerable form fields. When users view pages containing these compromised fields, the embedded JavaScript executes in their browsers.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 6.5.20.0< 2024.3.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed AEM versionAccess the AEM welcome page and navigate to 'Information' > 'Version' or append '/system/console/status-productinfo' to your AEM instance URL to view version detailsAffected if Installed version is below 6.5.20.0 or below 2024.3.0 (for cloud/flex releases)
-
Confirm Forms module is in useCheck if Adaptive Forms, Foundation Forms, or custom form components are enabled by navigating to /aem/forms in the AEM interface or reviewing installed form-related bundles in OSGi console at /system/console/bundlesAffected if Forms functionality (Adaptive Forms, Foundation Forms) is installed and active on the instance
-
Review form field configurations for injected scriptsNavigate to CRXDE Lite (/crx/de) and search under /content/forms for any form field nodes (typically under /apps or /content) - inspect the 'value', 'label', or 'placeholder' properties for script tags or JavaScript event handlersAffected if Any form field nodes contain script tags (<script>), JavaScript event handlers (onclick, onerror, onload), or suspicious encoded content that could execute as XSS
-
Audit form submission data for malicious payloadsCheck form submission folders in /content/forms/submissions or review the data stored in the form's submitted data store for any entries containing HTML tags, script elements, or JavaScript protocol handlersAffected if Form submission data contains unescaped HTML, script tags, or javascript: URLs stored in form fields
You are affected if your AEM version is below 6.5.20.0 or below 2024.3.0 AND you have Forms or Adaptive Forms enabled with form fields that could accept and store user input without proper sanitization.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped6.5.20.02024.3.0
Apply the vendor patch by upgrading to AEM 6.5.20 or later. Additionally, implement input validation and output encoding on all form fields to prevent script injection.
AEM 6.5.20.0 or later (on-premise); AEM as a Cloud Service 2024.3.0 or later
- 1. Identify current Adobe Experience Manager version by checking /system/console/systeminfo or AEM welcome page
- 2. Plan and schedule a maintenance window for the upgrade
- 3. Perform a full backup of the AEM instance including the content repository (CRX) and database
- 4. Upgrade Adobe Experience Manager to version 6.5.20.0 or later (for on-premise deployments)
- 5. Alternatively, if using cloud releases, upgrade to 2024.3.0 or later
- 6. After upgrade, verify the AEM instance starts successfully and all services are operational
- 7. Review Adobe's release notes for 6.5.20.0 to confirm the XSS vulnerability is addressed
- 8. Test the form fields that were previously vulnerable to ensure malicious scripts are now properly sanitized
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-26061 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-26061 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data