CVE-2024-26066
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAdobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.20 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by an attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim’s browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA stored Cross-Site Scripting vulnerability in Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.20 and earlier allows attackers to inject malicious JavaScript into form fields. The malicious payload is persisted in the system and executes in victims' browsers when they navigate to pages containing the affected fields.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 6.5.21< 2024.5CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check the installed Adobe Experience Manager versionAccess the AEM Web Console at /system/console or use the Package Manager to view the product version. This is typically visible on the Welcome screen or via the 'version' servlet at /system/console/productAffected if The installed version is 6.5.20 or earlier, or falls below version 2024.5
-
Confirm the exact version number against affected rangesCompare the discovered version to the vulnerable ranges: versions < 6.5.21 and versions < 2024.5 are affectedAffected if The version is 6.5.20 or earlier, or a 2024.x version prior to the 2024.5 release
-
Identify if Forms or Adaptive Forms components are deployedReview the AEM instance for any Adaptive Forms, Core Components Form, or Foundation Form implementations. Check the CRX/DE repository under /apps for form-related content packages or componentsAffected if Form components that accept user input are present in the environment
-
Inspect form field configurations for input validationExamine the form field component configurations in the AEM authoring environment or in the corresponding XML/JSON configuration files under /conf or /apps. Verify whether server-side output encoding or input validation is configuredAffected if Form fields lack proper output encoding or input validation configurations
-
Audit persisted form data for suspicious payloadsQuery the AEM repository (CRX) or form submission storage for entries containing script tags, JavaScript: URLs, or event handler attributes (onload, onerror, onclick) in form field valuesAffected if Malicious JavaScript payloads are found stored in form submission data
An AEM instance is affected if it runs version 6.5.20 or earlier (or a 2024.x version below 2024.5) AND has form components that accept user input without proper output encoding.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped6.5.212024.5
Upgrade Adobe Experience Manager to version 6.5.21 or later to apply the vendor patch. Additionally, implement output encoding on form fields and consider Content Security Policy headers as defense-in-depth.
Adobe Experience Manager 6.5.21 (or later) / AEM as a Cloud Service 2024.5 or later
- 1. Back up the current AEM instance including repository, database, and configuration files
- 2. Review Adobe Experience Manager release notes for version 6.5.21 for any migration requirements
- 3. If using AEM 6.5.x on-premise, upgrade the instance to version 6.5.21 or later by applying the latest service pack
- 4. If using AEM as a Cloud Service, ensure the environment is running the 2024.5 release or later
- 5. After upgrade, verify that the XSS filter configurations are properly enabled in the OSGi settings
- 6. Test the fixed form fields to confirm malicious scripts are properly sanitized
- 7. Clear AEM cache and rebuild any search indexes post-upgrade
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,888.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-26066 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-26066 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data