CVE-2024-26072
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAdobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.20 and earlier are affected by a DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. This vulnerability could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary JavaScript code in the context of the victim's browser session. Exploitation of this issue typically requires user interaction, such as convincing a victim to click on a specially crafted link or to submit a form that causes the vulnerable script to execute.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceAdobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.20 and earlier contain a DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability where client-side JavaScript processes user input from the DOM without proper sanitization. An attacker can craft malicious links or forms that cause arbitrary JavaScript execution in the victim's browser session when interacted with.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 6.5.21< 2024.5CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine AEM versionNavigate to AEM Welcome page > Tools > Operations > Diagnosis, or access /system/console/product.json to retrieve the exact installed version numberAffected if Version shows 6.5.20 or earlier, or a version below the 2024.5 milestone
-
Check AEM package version via consoleAccess /system/console/bundles and locate the core AEM bundles, or run 'npm version' if using AEM as a Cloud Service SDK, to confirm the specific release build numberAffected if Bundle version is prior to the 6.5.21 release or the 2024.5 release
-
Identify custom client-side code pathsReview /apps and /libs directories for custom JavaScript files (js.jsp, js.html, .js files) that read parameters from the DOM using location.search, document.referrer, or similar client-side APIsAffected if Custom JavaScript directly embeds URL parameters or DOM elements into HTML without encoding
-
Audit content security policy headersUse browser developer tools Network tab to inspect response headers from AEM pages, or check the Apache Sling header configuration in /system/console/config for Content-Security-Policy directivesAffected if CSP headers are missing, weak, or allow unsafe-inline scripts
You are affected if your AEM installation is version 6.5.20 or earlier (or pre-2024.5 for cloud), or if custom client-side code processes DOM input unsafely without CSP mitigation.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped6.5.212024.5
Apply Adobe's security patch (upgrade to AEM 6.5.21 or later) and validate that all user-supplied data in JavaScript code paths uses proper output encoding or content security policy headers.
AEM 6.5.21 (on-premise) or AEM Cloud Service 2024.5
- 1. Back up your current Adobe Experience Manager instance and database before proceeding with any upgrade.
- 2. Review the Adobe Experience Manager upgrade documentation for your deployment type (on-premise or cloud service).
- 3. For on-premise (6.x) installations: Upgrade to Adobe Experience Manager 6.5.21 by following the standard upgrade procedures in the official documentation.
- 4. For cloud service (2024.x) deployments: Upgrade to the 2024.5 release through the Adobe Cloud Manager or by requesting the upgrade from Adobe.
- 5. After upgrading, verify that the AEM instance starts successfully and all custom code remains functional.
- 6. Test the specific functionality that was vulnerable to ensure the XSS fix is properly applied.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-26072 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-26072 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data