CVE-2024-26085
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAdobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.20 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by an attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim’s browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceAdobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.20 and earlier contain a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in form fields. Attackers can inject malicious JavaScript payloads into form inputs, which are then stored and executed when subsequent users view the affected page containing those vulnerable fields.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 6.5.21< 2024.5CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine Adobe Experience Manager versionAccess the AEM Welcome page or check the product version through the system console (typically at /system/console/config or by reviewing the version.txt in the installation directory). Compare against affected versions: any AEM installation running version 6.5.20 or earlier, or any version prior to the 2024.5 release.Affected if The installed version is 6.5.20 or earlier, or the version is below 2024.5 (for cloud/continuous releases).
-
Identify form field usage in the environmentReview the AEM instance for custom or third-party form components. Check the /apps and /libs directories for custom form field components, especially in content fragments, adaptive forms, or custom-developed form implementations.Affected if Custom form components or third-party form implementations are installed and in use on the AEM instance.
-
Inspect form data storage for suspicious payloadsQuery the AEM repository (JCR) or examine stored form submission data for any JavaScript tags, script elements, or event handlers (onerror, onload, onclick, etc.) that may have been injected into form fields.Affected if Stored form data contains unsanitized JavaScript code or HTML tags that could be executed when viewed by other users.
-
Review content pages containing formsAccess pages that host form components and inspect the page source or rendered output to verify if input validation and output encoding are properly applied to all form fields.Affected if Form fields render user-supplied input without proper output encoding, allowing script execution.
You are affected if your AEM version is 6.5.20 or earlier (or pre-2024.5 for continuous releases) AND custom form fields are in use without proper input validation and output encoding.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped6.5.212024.5
Upgrade Adobe Experience Manager to version 6.5.21 or later. Additionally, implement output encoding and input validation on form fields to prevent script injection.
Adobe Experience Manager 6.5.21 or newer, or 2024.5 or newer (depending on your release track)
- Identify your current Adobe Experience Manager version (6.5.x or 2024.x release line)
- For AEM 6.5.x line: Upgrade to AEM 6.5.21 or later
- For AEM 2024 release line: Upgrade to 2024.5 or later
- After upgrade, verify the XSS protection is working by testing form fields that accept user input
- Ensure custom code that may have workarounds for the vulnerability is reviewed and updated to rely on the built-in fix
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-26085 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-26085 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data