CVE-2024-26105
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAdobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.19 and earlier are affected by a reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. If an attacker is able to convince a victim to visit a URL referencing a vulnerable page, malicious JavaScript content may be executed within the context of the victim's browser.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceAdobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.19 and earlier contain a reflected XSS vulnerability where malicious JavaScript can be injected into URL parameters. When a victim is tricked into visiting a crafted URL, the server reflects the unsanitized input back in the HTTP response, causing the malicious script to execute within the victim's browser context.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 6.5.20.0< 2024.3.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed Adobe Experience Manager versionAccess the AEM system information console at /system/console/status or check the version.properties file in the crx-quickstart directory. The version is typically displayed as a numerical release like 6.5.x or a date-based release like 2024.xAffected if The installed version is below 6.5.20.0 or below 2024.3.0
-
Identify URL parameter reflection pointsReview web application logs and proxy traces to identify which AEM endpoints accept user-supplied URL parameters and reflect them unencoded in HTTP responses. Common paths include content and commerce-related selectors.Affected if Any AEM endpoint reflects URL parameter values directly in the response body without sanitization
-
Verify if vulnerable endpoints are exposedTest suspected parameter-handling endpoints by injecting a benign payload like <script>alert(1)</script> into URL query parameters and examining whether the payload appears unescaped in the response.Affected if The test payload is reflected verbatim in the page output rather than being HTML-encoded
-
Check for Content Security Policy headersInspect HTTP response headers from AEM pages to determine if Content-Security-Policy headers are configured and enforced.Affected if No CSP headers are present, or CSP headers allow inline scripts, which would enable XSS execution
-
Review input validation configurationExamine AEM's sling:ignoreUrlParams or custom input validation filters in the OSGi configuration console at /system/console/configMgr.Affected if No input validation or output encoding filters are configured for the affected URL parameter handling
You are affected if your AEM version is below 6.5.20.0 or below 2024.3.0 AND your application reflects URL parameters in responses without sanitization.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped6.5.20.02024.3.0
Apply the AEM security patch (version 6.5.20 or later) to address the vulnerability. Additionally, implement input validation, output encoding, and Content Security Policy headers as defense-in-depth measures.
Adobe Experience Manager 6.5.20.0 (for 6.5.x branch) or 2024.3.0 (for 2024.x branch)
- 1. Identify the current Adobe Experience Manager version in use
- 2. Create a full backup of the AEM repository (including content and configurations)
- 3. Test the upgrade in a staging environment before applying to production
- 4. For AEM 6.5.x line: upgrade to version 6.5.20.0 or later
- 5. For AEM 2024.x line: upgrade to version 2024.3.0 or later
- 6. After upgrade, verify that the XSS vulnerability is resolved by testing the previously vulnerable endpoint
- 7. Validate that custom code and third-party integrations remain functional
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-26105 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-26105 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data