CVE-2024-26240
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedSecure Boot Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is a Secure Boot bypass vulnerability in UEFI firmware. Secure Boot is a security standard that ensures only cryptographically trusted software runs during the system boot process. A successful bypass would allow an attacker to execute arbitrary untrusted code at boot time, potentially compromising the entire system chain of trust.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 10.0.10240.20596< 10.0.14393.6897< 10.0.17763.5696< 10.0.19044.4291< 10.0.19045.4291< 10.0.22000.2899< 10.0.22621.3447< 10.0.22631.3447CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Windows build versionOpen Command Prompt and run 'winver' or 'systeminfo | findstr /B /C:"OS Version"' to see the installed Windows build numberAffected if The build number is lower than the threshold for your Windows version (e.g., for Windows 10 22h2, below 10.0.19045.4291)
-
Confirm Windows edition and servicing historyRun 'systeminfo' and note the OS Name, Version, and Build number. Verify which Windows 10/11 release (1507, 1607, 1809, 21h2, 22h2, or 23h2) is installedAffected if The build version corresponds to an affected release listed in the CVE and is below the fixed version threshold
-
Verify Secure Boot statusOpen msinfo32 and look for 'Secure Boot State' or run 'Confirm-SecureBootUEFI' in PowerShellAffected if Secure Boot is enabled - the bypass only affects systems where Secure Boot is configured, as it circumvents the Secure Boot trust model
-
Check UEFI firmware versionRun 'Get-WmiObject win32_bios' in PowerShell or check firmware version through 'msinfo32' under 'BIOS Version'Affected if Firmware version cannot be directly compared against CVE thresholds as updates are vendor-specific; the vulnerability exists in the UEFI implementation, not in Windows itself
You are likely affected if you are running any of the listed Windows 10/11 versions below the fixed build thresholds AND have Secure Boot enabled in your system firmware.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped10.0.10240.2059610.0.14393.689710.0.17763.5696
Apply vendor-supplied firmware updates that address this vulnerability. Ensure Secure Boot is properly enabled and configured, and update the UEFI revocation database (dbx) if the update includes new revoked signatures.
Minimum fixed versions: Windows 10 1507: 10.0.10240.20596 | Windows 10 1607: 10.0.14393.6897 | Windows 10 1809: 10.0.17763.5696 | Windows 10 21h2: 10.0.19044.4291 | Windows 10 22h2: 10.0.19045.4291 | Windows 11 21h2: 10.0.22000.2899 | Windows 11 22h2: 10.0.22621.3447 | Windows 11 23h2: 10.0.22631.34
- Identify the current Windows version by running 'winver' or 'systeminfo' in Command Prompt
- Determine which Windows 10 or 11 release channel (1507, 1607, 1809, 21h2, 22h2, 11 21h2, 11 22h2, or 11 23h2) is currently installed
- For Windows 10 1507: Upgrade to version 10.0.10240.20596 or later
- For Windows 10 1607: Upgrade to version 10.0.14393.6897 or later
- For Windows 10 1809: Upgrade to version 10.0.17763.5696 or later
- For Windows 10 21h2: Upgrade to version 10.0.19044.4291 or later
- For Windows 10 22h2: Upgrade to version 10.0.19045.4291 or later
- For Windows 11 21h2: Upgrade to version 10.0.22000.2899 or later
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation24.0 h
- Testing16.0 h
- Review / QA8.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $15,616.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-26240 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-26240 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data